Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

To: LottieDah

.... and McCain has conceded.


14 posted on 11/07/2008 7:32:56 AM PST by Mashood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Mashood

Gore conceded and then retracted. Even several days after the fact, can McCain not retract concession and wait for absentee and provisional ballots to be counted?

Although at this point I doubt Governor Palin (God Bless her!) would want to be associated with him.


28 posted on 11/07/2008 7:40:29 AM PST by melissa_in_ga (Welcome to the USSA. Be alert. Stock up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: Mashood

“.... and McCain has conceded.” ~ Masshood

His whole campaign was a “concession”:

So learn this - and learn it good (paraphrasing Rush from yesterday - URL at bottom):

We (Reagan conservatives / “classic liberals”) did not lose the election. Conservatism was not on the ballot. The Republican Party has not sought to be conservative since the new tone was initiated by the Bush administration in 2001.

The frustrating thing about McCain’s campaign was that we didn’t really have a chance to contrast ourselves with Obama and the radicalism of his campaign. In four-and-a-half hours of televised presidential debate, not one mention of any of the extremism that Obama has said he was for.

John McCain’s concession speech was a testament to his campaign. His whole campaign was a concession speech!

We have now demonstrated to one and all how to lose. We know how to lose. There are those that we are talking about here who have been the architects of this defeat, and it is going to be crucial to point this out as the reestablishment of conservatism takes place.

Some say not to worry because Obama’s going to have to govern from the center. He’s going to have to because look at the economic crisis and look at all the bailout money and look at terrorism.

Read the New York Times! They are demanding, A, he close Gitmo; B, he raise taxes right now; C, he get out of Iraq.

The left thinks they got somebody that’s going to implement their agenda even before he gets to the White House. Their rage is going to go someplace. These people live and thrive on rage. It is their fuel, and they’re going to find an outlet for it somewhere. They are perpetually miserable. They are perpetually unhappy. They might be in a moment right now of bliss, but the hard stuff hasn’t started yet, and it’s going to very soon.

[] Governing from the center?!! His first appointment, his chief of staff is Rahm Emanuel. He is good a old-fashioned Chicago thug just like Obama is a good old-fashioned Chicago thug. On the night of the Clinton election, Rahm Emanuel was so angry at the president’s enemies that he stood up at a celebratory dinner with colleagues from the campaign; Rahm Emanuel grabbed a steak knife and he began rattling off a list of betrayers. As he listed their names, he shouted, “Dead! Dead! Dead!” and he plunged the steak knife into the table after every name. This is not a bunch of people that are going to govern from the center. These are left-wing extremists. They are radicals, and we’re not gonna let these people either on our side or on the left say, “Well, we didn’t really know that much about this guy.”

McCain said, “Ladies and gentlemen, my friends, my friends, I want us to come together tonight in unity with Senator and President-Elect Obama.”

Unity with President-Elect Obama? Abandon 57 million Americans who voted Republican and want no part of an Obama agenda. Unity with Obama?

What little we know about Obama is precisely that he is a radical.

Do you plan to unify with a radical extremist who is not going to govern from the center? Pelosi and Reid are not gonna govern from the center. What the hell do people think they wanted to win this election for? When do liberals govern from the center? The only time they do that is when they have to, when there are enough Republicans around to keep their extremism in check — and that’s going to be interesting to see if we have enough now.

I know McCain wanted to sound gracious, but what is the point now of saying unify with Obama? Does Obama say he wants to unify with us? No.
There is no unity with Obama. He doesn’t cross the aisle.

Let me ask you which of the following Obama and Democrat agenda items you want to sign on to:

Do you want to compromise with them on the Employee Free Choice Act? These are things that they have said they’re going to do.

Do you want to sign on with the Employee Free Choice Act? Do you want to have union thugs in your small business being able to harass your employees who cannot vote secret ballot on whether to unionize or not? Do you want union thugs visiting your employees’ homes to pressure them, to vote to unionize your small business?

Any of you who want to make nice out there want to compromise and unify on the Democrat Party’s position on the Fairness Doctrine? Chuck Schumer just yesterday suggested that the federal government can legislate and regulate porn on the airwaves, what’s the difference in talk radio?

How about the nationalization of health care?

Estate tax increases. You want to unify with Obama on increasing the death tax when you croak?

Unify with Obama on driver’s licenses for illegal aliens?

Unify on capital gains tax increase?

Unify on defense cuts? Barney Frank wants to cut the defense budget 25%, get out of Iraq, get out of Afghanistan; while Putin’s loading up Europe with missiles and the Gaza Strip is coming alive.

Unify around the notion of liberal judicial appointments to the federal bench, including the Supreme Court? Left wing judges who attempt to by-pass the will of the people through their legislatures and make laws themselves from the bench (rather than interpret them as the constitution demands).

Unify around racial and ethnic preferences and reparations? You want to agree that we’re a bunch of racist pigs, sexist, bigots, homophobes, and expand the whole concept of racial preferences and quotas and affirmative action. (Black leader from the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, Charles Steele, Jr., said: “We haven’t accomplished anything. This doesn’t mean anything. Obama doesn’t have slave blood. His wife has slave blood, but he doesn’t. So he doesn’t come from the down-with-the-struggle crowd.”)

Can we oppose the idea that confiscatory taxation produces prosperity, when in fact it punishes economic growth? Yes, we can!

Can we oppose the notion that our national greatness is derived from an ever growing government instead of the freedom from government our Founders envisioned? Yes, we can.

Can we oppose the belief that one’s earnings must be redistributed for the false promise of fairness? Yes, we can.

Can we oppose the belief that it is immoral to secure our own borders or defend ourselves from terrorists intent on destroying us? Yes, we can.

Can we do all that and more? Yes, we can. Because now it is plain for one and all to see that taking the moderate path of appeasement leads to abysmal defeat. Bush’s new tone came home to roost when Obama won the election.

And the last thing we’re going to unify around is the notion that what really killed McCain was Sarah Palin.

Yes We Can: The Reestablishment of Principled Conservatism Begins
November 5, 2008
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_110508/content/01125106.guest.html

*

“This was such an enormous Democratic year that even John Murtha won his congressional seat in Pennsylvania after calling his constituents racists.

It turns out they’re not racists — they’re retards.”

The Reign of Lame Falls Mainly on McCain
by Ann Coulter 11/05/2008 ET
http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?print=yes&id=29385


51 posted on 11/07/2008 8:05:38 AM PST by Matchett-PI (Saul Alinsky's radical operatives have succeeded beyond his wildest dreams.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson