Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Thompson's Uneven Performance
The Weekly Standard ^ | November 4, 2007 | " Richelieu"

Posted on 11/06/2007 12:20:06 AM PST by 2ndDivisionVet

Fred Thompson took his acid bath this morning on Meet the Press. Measured by the traditional standards of Sunday morning political theater, it was an uneven performance. Fred did well on international affairs and "stumbled" on domestic policy.

His answer on abortion in particular will come as an uncomfortable revelation to some of his more conservative supporters. I have a team of Jesuits attempting to unravel the yarn-balled logic of Fred's rambling answer, but it appears to boil down to this: "I'm 100 percent pro-life and have voted 100 percent pro-life. I hope one day Roe will be overturned and this issue will be sent back to the states and allow them to celebrate their wonderful diversity with an informed local decision. That local decision shouldn't include any crazy pro-life stuff that criminalizes anything that shouldn't be criminalized for doctors and young women. That's my firm pro-life record, which has always" - insert subliminal message about slick-talking-Yankee-Mormon feather merchants here - "been exactly the same. Glad I cleared that all up for you, Tim."

My team of Jesuits has just informed me that they have put out an emergency call to the Grand Rabbi of Jerusalem to assist in their efforts to comprehend Fred's answer. To my ear it sounds like a pro-life manifesto written by a joint committee of conservative constitutional lawyers and the board of NARAL. I suspect Fred will probably catch new trouble from social conservatives over this and his similar "Let the States be Fabulous" view on gay marriage. (Such is the true beauty of "federalism." It is the Swiss Army Knife of passing the buck on tricky questions. It always sounds pretty good until some state elects a Huey Long.)

The style enforcers in the office of Officially Required Candidate Behavior will bemoan these stumbles, as well as Thompson's way of thinking out loud while trying to wind his way around the exploding fragments of Grenadier Russert's tricky questions. Thompson's struggling campaign will probably take little comfort in today's performance. But I left the interview feeling entirely comfortable with the idea of Fred Thompson being president of the United States. He is informed, thoughtful, and struck me as a decent man trying to navigate the increasingly ridiculous idiom of American politics with all of its trapdoors, over-simplification, and litmus-mania. He resists buckling down and accepting the foolish rules of the presidential campaign game, which in itself is, at least to me, impressively presidential. Tim Russert had the grace to save to the end of the interview an obligatory question about this morning's breathless Washington Post story on a long-past drug charge against one of Thompson's friends. In his answer, Thompson was measured and sensible and seemed more interested in giving his friend a fair shake than in winning candidate performance points by instantly tossing a good pal's still breathing body to the media pack. Good for him.


TOPICS: Tennessee; Campaign News; Issues; State and Local
KEYWORDS: 2008; abortion; doma; drivebymedia; election; electionpresident; elections; evangelicals; federalism; firstprinciples; fred; frederalism; fredthompson; gaymarriage; gop; hla; homosexualagenda; homosexuals; media; meetthepress; msm; mtp; presidential; primaries; prolife; reaganesque; republicans; roeversuswade; scotus; talkradio; thompson; thompson44; timrussert; valuesvoters; vlwc; whitehouse

1 posted on 11/06/2007 12:20:07 AM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Fred’s opposition to a Life and Marriage Amendment are two of the main reasons I can’t support him. If he gets the nomination, I would definitely vote for him over Hildabeast, though.


2 posted on 11/06/2007 12:44:02 AM PST by Pinkbell (Duncan Hunter 2008 - Protecting and Restoring America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pinkbell; All
Fred on the Issues (from www.Fred08.com)

National Security

The first responsibility of government is to protect the American people, the homeland, and our way of life. Today we face the urgent threat of radical Islamic terrorists. Al Qaeda is committed to attacking us here at home, and wants to use weapons of mass destruction (WMD) to kill millions. We must never give them that opportunity. We must defeat the terrorists abroad, and that begins in Iraq and Afghanistan—the central fronts in this global war. We must show the world we have the will to fight and win. A weakened America - or an America that appears weaker - will only encourage further attacks. We must persevere. As Commander-in-Chief, the president must ensure the United States has the means to achieve victory. Presidential leadership requires talking to the American people about these stakes, mapping out a clear vision for success, and devising a comprehensive strategy for achieving it. I am committed to:
* A larger, more capable, and more modern military that can defeat terrorists, deter adversaries, and defend the U.S. and our interests. * A missile defense system that can protect the U.S. and our allies from long-range ballistic missiles. * An enhanced intelligence community, with robust human-intelligence capabilities, focused on terrorism and proliferation. * A robust approach to homeland security that will protect our nation from terrorists and WMD, regardless of where they come from. * A strengthened system of global alliances to better combat terrorists, proliferators, and traditional threats to our interests. * A judicial system that deals with the realities of terrorists and unlawful enemy combatants.

Federal Budget and Spending/Budgetary Reform

In a few short years—not a generation from now—a fiscal tsunami that could imperil our security and economic prosperity will hit our nation and place an unfair burden of debt on our children and grandchildren. The tens of trillions of dollars in debt that will be accumulated over the next few decades will do immense harm to our economy. This burden is now estimated at $170,000 per person and $440,000 per family. Time is running out to address this looming crisis. We need market-based approaches to reform that guarantee benefits for those who need them and embrace personal responsibility and cost-effectiveness without raising taxes. Given the scope and urgency of this problem, and the burden it will place on our children, reform is not only an economic necessity, it is a moral imperative that requires action now. I am committed to:
* Opening the government’s fiscal books on this looming crisis for all to see and understand. * Working with individuals of all political persuasions to develop a comprehensive solution to the pending fiscal crisis. * Leading and making the hard choices necessary, to include cutting wasteful government spending, to safeguard our security, promote our prosperity, and protect our children and grandchildren from fiscal calamity.

Tax Reform

The U.S. tax code is broken and a burden on U.S. taxpayers and businesses, large and small. Today’s tax code is particularly hostile to savings and investment, and it shows. To make matters worse, its complexity is a drag on our productivity and economic growth. Moreover, taxpayers spend billions of dollars and untold hours each year filling out complicated tax returns, just so they can send more money to Washington, much of it for wasteful programs and the pet projects of special interests. We need lower taxes, and we need to let taxpayers keep more of their hard-earned dollars—they know best where and how to spend them. And we need to make the system simpler and fairer for all. To ensure America’s long term prosperity and economic security, I am committed to:
* Fundamental tax reform built on the principles of simplicity, fairness, and growth. * A new tax code that gets the government out of our citizens’ pocketbooks, while enhancing U.S. competitiveness abroad. Dissolution of the IRS as we know it.

Healthcare

Americans have the best healthcare in the world. Some, however, choose not be insured; others cannot afford it. Every American should be able to get health insurance coverage that is affordable, fully accessible, and portable. Coverage should meet their individual needs and put them in control. Those who propose a one-size-fits-all Washington-controlled program ignore the cost, inefficiency, and inadequate care that such a system offers. Access to affordable, portable health care can be made available for all Americans without imposing new mandates or raising taxes. Current government programs must also be streamlined and improved so that those who truly need help can get the health care they need. I am committed to a healthcare system that:
* Realigns programs and creates a system around individual consumers and patients by providing more information and more opportunities to choose affordable health care options that best meet their needs and those of their families. * Improves the individual health of all Americans by shifting to a system that promotes cost-effective prevention, chronic-care management, and personal responsibility * Modernizes delivery and administration of care by encouraging the widespread use of clinical best practices, medical information technology, and other innovations. * Increases competition and consumer choice while streamlining regulations through free-market solutions that benefit individuals and reduce costs for employers. * Promotes and speeds medical research and life-sciences innovation.

Government Effectiveness

Our government is outdated, inefficient, and wasteful. It is often unable to perform even the most basic tasks our citizens expect. It is no longer enough just to want limited government; the American people deserve more effective government. Given today’s challenges, we cannot afford—and shouldn’t accept—anything less than a nimble, effective, and efficient government that is able to focus its resources on the important issues facing our country. It must be able act on behalf of the American people and our national interests in a timely manner. The key to competent government is strong, committed leadership from the top. The key to good government is good people who are well-managed and put the national interest first. I am committed to:
* Attracting and rewarding the best Americans to serve in government and ensuring they have the authority and resources needed to get the job done. * Fixing government accounting so tax dollars are properly spent and the American people know exactly what they are being spent on. * Improving government performance by making agencies accountable for accomplishing their missions on time and within budget. * Ensuring information technology systems are secure and that they give our government the capacity and effectiveness to get the job done.

Building Strong Families

Strong families are the bedrock of our nation and our culture. They are built around the sanctity of life and the institution of marriage, which is the union of a man and a woman. To counter coarseness in today’s culture that oftentimes victimizes our children and undermines the traditional values parents want to instill, we must not only protect but strengthen the institutions of family and marriage. I am committed to:
* Using the Presidency to encourage policies that promote a culture of life, strengthen the institution of marriage and traditional families, and advance freedom of religion. * Returning authority to the levels of government closest to families and communities—the states—and then protecting states from further intrusion by the federal government, the judiciary, and other states. * Combating the spread of obscenity over TV and other media by making sure parents can better exercise their responsibilities.

Immigration

The United States is a nation of immigrants. Throughout our history, legal immigrants have brought energy, ideas, strength, and diversity to our country, our economy, and our culture. This must continue. But in the post-9/11 world, immigration is more of a national security issue. A government that cannot secure its borders and determine who may enter and who may not, abrogates a fundamental responsibility. I am committed to:
* Securing our borders and enforcing immigration laws. Amnesty is not an option and the toleration of “sanctuary cities” must end. * Reviewing our immigration laws and policies to ensure they advance our national interests. Uniting Americans by welcoming legal immigrants willing to learn English, assimilate into our communities, and become productive citizens.

Education

A well-educated citizenry is vital to our security, our economy, and our democracy. Despite the tens of billions of dollars spent on education by Washington each year, and the hundreds of federal education programs now in place, our children are still falling behind, particularly in subjects crucial to the global economy in which we live. At a time when America is behind other developed countries in education excellence, the federal role in education is too intrusive and too bureaucratic, and has become part of the problem. State and local governments are closest to the parents, the kids, and the schools, and best situated to implement changes and innovations that best educate children. I am committed to:
* Giving parents more choices in education and schools less bureaucracy. * Reviewing federal programs for cost-effectiveness, reducing federal mandates, returning education money to the states, and empowering parents by promoting voucher programs, charter schools, and other innovations that enhance education excellence through competition and choice. * Encouraging students and teachers to pursue careers in science, technology, engineering, and math—fields that are crucial to our security, competitiveness, and prosperity. * Promoting transparency to assess performance, promote accountability, and share innovations in education at all levels.

Appointing Judges Faithful To Our Constitution

Activist judges across the country seem intent on legislating from the bench to promote a culture of abortion, redefine marriage, and undermine families—in effect re-shaping the values of our entire society without the consent of the people. We need judges who recognize their role in our democracy is to interpret, not make, the law. I am committed to:
* Appointing strict constructionist judges who will interpret the law, not impose their views on us by legislating from the bench.

Energy Security

The energy challenges our nation faces today are real and significant. Our dependence on foreign sources of oil threatens our national security and puts our economic prosperity at risk. America must rise to the challenge and take the steps necessary to become more energy independent before this becomes a crisis. No one solution will solve the energy challenges we face; all ideas must be on the table. Greater energy security will enhance our ability to pursue our foreign policy and national security objectives. Increasing our energy independence and investing in alternative energy sources will also produce a healthier environment. And while we don’t know for certain how or why climate change is occurring, it makes sense to take reasonable steps to reduce CO2 emissions without harming our economy. Overall, I am committed to:
* A balanced approach to energy security that increases domestic supplies, reduces demand for oil and gas, and promotes alternative fuels and other diverse energy sources. * Investing in renewable and alternative fuels to promote greater energy independence and a cleaner environment. * An energy policy that invests in the advanced technologies of tomorrow and places more emphasis on conservation and energy efficiency. * Conducting research and development into technologies that improve the environment, especially the reduction of CO2 emissions.

Second Amendment

I strongly support the Second Amendment of the Constitution, which protects an individual’s right to keep and bear arms. Gun control is touted as a major crime-control measure. But some of the places with the strictest gun-control laws also have high violent-crime rates. Disarming law-abiding citizens does not prevent crime. The answer to violent crime is smart, effective, and aggressive law enforcement. The real effect of these gun-control measures is to place onerous restrictions on law-abiding citizens who use firearms for such legal activities as self-defense, sport-shooting, hunting, and collecting. I am committed to:
* Strictly enforcing existing laws and severely punishing violent criminals. * Protecting the rights individual Americans enjoy under the Second Amendment.

3 posted on 11/06/2007 1:12:13 AM PST by 2ndDivisionVet (Your "dirt" on Fred is about as persuasive as a Nancy Pelosi Veteran's Day Speech)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Clinton and the libs are gonna eat this guy alive. That’s why they wrote that Harper article to give Fred a boost. Clinton wants Fred to win the GOP nomination.


4 posted on 11/06/2007 3:26:43 AM PST by Romneyfor President2008
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Romneyfor President2008

Yeah, I’m sure the Clintons would would rather have a difficult target like Fred, than an easy target like that flip-flopping, medicine socializing, gay marriage allowing, abortion supporting (until last Tuesday), pandering, wimp of a candidate named Willard Myth Romney.


5 posted on 11/06/2007 6:17:19 AM PST by perfect_rovian_storm (John Cox 2008: Because Duncan Hunter just isn't obscure enough for me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Romneyfor President2008

You signed up today to post this? Is that you, Mitt?


6 posted on 11/06/2007 6:22:16 AM PST by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Romneyfor President2008
Hahahahaha! You sign up TODAY as "Romney for President2008" and already you're on a FRed thread bashing him! Tells me who Mitt and the Mittwits fear, that's for sure!! LOL!
7 posted on 11/06/2007 12:34:11 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet (Your "dirt" on Fred is about as persuasive as a Nancy Pelosi Veteran's Day Speech)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

If Howard Baker was saying this crap in 1980 we would SCREAM that he was a LYING ABORTIONIST!

Yet for some reason... blind desperation perhaps... Fred is getting way to wide of a pass on these issues...

= (


8 posted on 11/06/2007 12:51:34 PM PST by RachelFaith (Doing NOTHING... about the illegals already here IS Amnesty !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Romneyfor President2008

Clinton and the libs are gonna eat this guy alive.


Yep you just know they are shaking in the boots at the thought of having to face Willard.


9 posted on 11/06/2007 1:03:00 PM PST by deport (>>>--Iowa Caucuses .. 57 days and counting--<<< [ Meanwhile:-- Cue Spooky Music--])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Is there anyone, ANYONE, who is willing to stand up to any of the loony-toon leftist authoritarians' enviro-hoaxes??? Let’s explore everywhere, build new nuclear plants, and END this ethanol subsidy insanity. Anyone with half a mind KNOWS that CO2, esp. the man-made kinds, contributes nothing to "climate change". This acquiescence to those who wish to destroy Western civilization makes me want to vomit. If Americans are too weak and confused now to hear the whole truth, it's time they were educated! It's time that Republicans stopped running away for fear of defeat. Bob
10 posted on 11/06/2007 1:37:25 PM PST by alstewartfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RachelFaith

How old were you in 1980, may I ask? At the time, I was serving in the armed forces, so I was a little out of the loop of political debate, myself. However, I was raised in California until the mid 70’s and I seem to recall then Governor Reagan signing an abortion bill and a tax hike. Later, of course, he changed direction. Please look up “federalism” in a dictionary, then get back with us, okay?


11 posted on 11/06/2007 1:52:37 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet (Your "dirt" on Fred is about as persuasive as a Nancy Pelosi Veteran's Day Speech)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

How about you read Hamilton on Federalism. Or better yet Lincoln on A House Divided. Or for that matter read the election results on Feb 6th...

I predict Me = 3 for 3 and You.... Nada for Zippo...

PAX


12 posted on 11/06/2007 5:59:04 PM PST by RachelFaith (Doing NOTHING... about the illegals already here IS Amnesty !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Mitt Romney tried to say he was always pro-life. When he was called on it he admitted he had been pro-choice, but now he changed his position. Fred is trying to get away with what Mitt couldn’t. He says he 100% pro-life, he just doesn’t support the criminalization of abortion. That makes him pro-choice. The difference between Fred and Mitt is that Fred hasn’t changed his position at all. He’s still pro-choice.


13 posted on 11/07/2007 12:57:30 PM PST by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson