Skip to comments.
Oprah Insensitive to Celiac Disease......
Oprah Magazine ^
| September 2003
| Satelite Sisters
Posted on 08/31/2003 12:04:05 PM PDT by davidosborne
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 next last
To: JennieOsborne
I was just about to write "thank you" but where is it?
"It is posted under "Photos" because it is a jpg file. Once you go there and click on it, you can view it in full size."
It's nice to actually have facts rather than a link to a site that doesn't mention the subject or generalities such as, "on another yahoo group."
So, where is "Photos", on FreeReuplic, or ?
To: davidosborne
Thanks for the ping. I hadn't heard of celiac disease until now. If these Satellite Sisters are the same that have a radio talk show, I'm not surprised at their not researching the question at hand.
22
posted on
08/31/2003 9:03:57 PM PDT
by
skr
(The liberals are only interested in seeking Weapons for Bush Destruction)
To: JennieOsborne; /\XABN584; 10mm; 3D-JOY; 75thOVI; 5Madman; <1/1,000,000th%; 11B3; 1Peter2:16; ...
REF: Sept. issue O-Magazine, pg. 87....
We apologise for our insensitivity. We had never heard of celiac's disease or its dangers. In our ignorance, we misused the phrase "gluten-free", not knowing its real meaning and connection to the genetic disease, Celiac's. We feel awful that our careless and ill-informed use of words has caused you and your family pain. Your letter and many others have served to educate. We can only assume that lots of people are in the dark about celiac's and the issues you and your family face. We do intend to educate ourselves with all the information we received so that we can add our voices to the chorus of the informed about this subject ( rather then the point of view of the ignorant and stupid which we represented so adequately).
I am a mother myself and there is no way I would knowingly shun a kid with a genetic disease. In our O piece, which is meant to be humorous, we tried to poke fun at a mother who is overly vigilant about her child's diet, in a "no white sugar" kind of way. Obviously, we were way off base on the real implications of the phrase "gluten-free". Again, my deepest apologies. And my best wishes for your son's continued good health.
Lian Dolan
the youngest sister
ATTN: FReepers... maybe I took this a little too personal because we deal with this issue everyday, having to educate people when we eat at restaurants and get strange looks when we explain how we need 1 meal prepared "separately" etc..etc....
the purpose of this thread was to educate.. and I think we were successful.. my apologies to anyone who was bothered by the ping to this thread.. I will remove those of you who requested to be removed...
FReegards,
David
23
posted on
09/03/2003 12:31:32 AM PDT
by
davidosborne
(www.davidosborne.net)
To: JennieOsborne; /\XABN584; 10mm; 3D-JOY; 75thOVI; 5Madman; <1/1,000,000th%; 11B3; 1Peter2:16; ...
REF: Sept. issue O-Magazine, pg. 87....
We apologise for our insensitivity. We had never heard of celiac's disease or its dangers. In our ignorance, we misused the phrase "gluten-free", not knowing its real meaning and connection to the genetic disease, Celiac's. We feel awful that our careless and ill-informed use of words has caused you and your family pain. Your letter and many others have served to educate. We can only assume that lots of people are in the dark about celiac's and the issues you and your family face. We do intend to educate ourselves with all the information we received so that we can add our voices to the chorus of the informed about this subject ( rather then the point of view of the ignorant and stupid which we represented so adequately).
I am a mother myself and there is no way I would knowingly shun a kid with a genetic disease. In our O piece, which is meant to be humorous, we tried to poke fun at a mother who is overly vigilant about her child's diet, in a "no white sugar" kind of way. Obviously, we were way off base on the real implications of the phrase "gluten-free". Again, my deepest apologies. And my best wishes for your son's continued good health.
Lian Dolan
the youngest sister
ATTN: FReepers... maybe I took this a little too personal because we deal with this issue everyday, having to educate people when we eat at restaurants and get strange looks when we explain how we need 1 meal prepared "separately" etc..etc....
the purpose of this thread was to educate.. and I think we were successful.. my apologies to anyone who was bothered by the ping to this thread.. I will remove those of you who requested to be removed...
FReegards,
David
24
posted on
09/03/2003 12:33:45 AM PDT
by
davidosborne
(www.davidosborne.net)
To: davidosborne
Big deal.
25
posted on
09/03/2003 1:00:50 AM PDT
by
ppaul
To: ppaul
It may not be a big deal to you.... but raising a celiac kid is difficult enough without having those who are ignorant tell you that you are "socially unacceptable" ..... education is key to ending the ignorance of "Gluten-Free"
26
posted on
09/03/2003 2:10:19 AM PDT
by
davidosborne
(www.davidosborne.net)
To: davidosborne
Good morning, David. How's are things going in Florida?
27
posted on
09/03/2003 3:05:29 AM PDT
by
E.G.C.
To: davidosborne
David, sorry to burst your bubble, but this is the typical media/movie star "bedbug" letter. It is from some low-level staffer. It means nothing.
Oprah, and every other "personality," cares not a darn about Celiac Disease. The Oprah Winfrey Show has one purpose; make money for Oprah Winfrey. If they can use your family's disease to generate viewers for a program, so they can sell more advertising, and make more money, they will like that. Other than that, they can care less about the problem.
There are 22,000 identifyable "causes" in America, from preventing abuse of the Ardvark to the preservation of Zoos. Your issue is no more important to the public than any of the others are, and frankly, your issue is a lot less important than some other issues.
Again, I'm sorry that a family member is affected by this disease, but when this country is threatned by Radical Islamics that wish to kill every America, not just the wheat-eaters, and a Democratic-Socialist machine that wants to control everything, "TV-hostess insensivity to a food sensitivity" as not one of the major problems facing the Republic.
28
posted on
09/03/2003 6:02:32 AM PDT
by
MindBender26
(For more news as it happens, stay tuned to your local FReeper station.........)
To: davidosborne
I have to agree with the others when referring to Oprah, "whatever".
I bet the "sisters" would really have a problem with my wife and our Autistic son who for a year was on a gluten-free diet.
Some Autistic kids have responded well to a gluten free diet. Though he endured potato milk he got to like corn chips. Unfortunately, nearly every prepared food in the world has gluten (wheat, barley, etc) in it as some type of filler. We ordered special coatings, cookie mixes and such from Ener-G Foods in Seattle and my wife prepared and cooked everything by hand. The cookies were tolerable. We haven't gone to a restaurant in three years.
He's not on that diet anymore and we had to break him of it since he had gotten used to the taste of things.
I empathize with you and your family. Maintaining a gluten free diet is a major pain. I'm not sure how this translated into something this "sister" didn't like about the other mom but some families deal with issues in different ways. I know a lot of "oh woe is me" parents of Autistic children. I don't enjoy their company as much as other folks I know either. It doesn't help the kids if you're depressed about their condition. It ain't easy, but no one said it would be.
Here's a thread on childhood disability that really drew sparks:
The original:
Boy's letter on abortion rights wins him trip to D.C. [Free Republic]
The Response:
When Even the Churches Abandon the Helpless [FreeRepublic activism works] [Free Republic]
To: davidosborne
thankyou for remembering and thankyou for the ping. Though I am pretty sure this is not my problem, it is pretty close, and may be some variation of it. I must explore further.
30
posted on
09/03/2003 12:03:22 PM PDT
by
XBob
To: FormerlyAnotherLurker; davidosborne; Ken522; DManA
31
posted on
09/03/2003 12:35:48 PM PDT
by
restornu
(Always keep your words soft and sweet, just in case you have to eat them.)
To: FormerlyAnotherLurker; davidosborne; Ken522; DManA
32
posted on
09/03/2003 12:45:31 PM PDT
by
restornu
(Always keep your words soft and sweet, just in case you have to eat them.)
To: FormerlyAnotherLurker; davidosborne; Ken522; DManA
This Thread is already on Google!
GOOGLE IS A INSTANCE ROOMER MILL!
General Interest | latest threads
... that was brought to my attention by Celiac Kids E-group..For more information
about celiac disease go to CELIAC.COM Copy of message I recieved..... ...
www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/browse - 80k - Sep 2, 2003 - Cached - Similar pages
33
posted on
09/03/2003 12:56:21 PM PDT
by
restornu
(Always keep your words soft and sweet, just in case you have to eat them.)
To: davidosborne
Where is this article or is this another "Urban Legend?"
I just send this to them to check this story out!
I just find it so unlike Opera Style!
http://snopes.com/snopes.asp I am sorry for anyone who is inflicted with this it is a most difficult way to live!
Myself I am dysleic and at time ADD and much of life has been a challenge!
34
posted on
09/03/2003 1:27:46 PM PDT
by
restornu
(Always keep your words soft and sweet, just in case you have to eat them.)
To: restornu; davidosborne; Ken522; DManA
My thought is it is just a hoax. The only evidence I've seen is it was "sent to me in an e-mail" variety. The majority never saw anything. When Google site searches show nothing I would really need hard evidence to believe it. So, for now, just the typical stupid Internet hoax nonsense.
Didn't even bother with the "Oprah insensitive" nonsense since nowhere does she say anything. Blame her editor (ONLY if true) but even though I can't stand her, it's not her fault (again IF true).
To: FormerlyAnotherLurker
I checked it out personally at the store...... the remark is on PAGE 87, of the Sept. Issue of O magazine... I did NOT purchase the magazine...
FReegards,
David
36
posted on
09/03/2003 4:47:17 PM PDT
by
davidosborne
(www.davidosborne.net)
To: davidosborne
37
posted on
09/03/2003 4:56:30 PM PDT
by
restornu
(Always keep your words soft and sweet, just in case you have to eat them.)
To: restornu
Its the Satelite Sisters page... PAGE 87
38
posted on
09/03/2003 5:02:59 PM PDT
by
davidosborne
(www.davidosborne.net)
To: davidosborne; FormerlyAnotherLurker
Where did you original source for this article come from?
For some reason you posted the address to Oprah.com
That is not her O Magazine address
and the Oprah Mag you listed is not the source!
So where did this article come from?
Don't you think you should give legit links?
39
posted on
09/03/2003 6:28:30 PM PDT
by
restornu
(Always keep your words soft and sweet, just in case you have to eat them.)
To: Gunrunner2
Thank you I agree there is something wrong here and not just spelling
Satelite Sister
is spelled wrong. I read this man profile I wonder about his real purpose?
Oprah Mag does not list Satelite Sister as a monthly feature!
I do not watch Oprah, but I do know she is a champion of the underdog so this article is incongruen to her MO!
40
posted on
09/03/2003 6:48:11 PM PDT
by
restornu
(Always keep your words soft and sweet, just in case you have to eat them.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson