My healthy ex brother law had got the shot. Year later, he had cancer spreading all throughout his body. You can take the conspiracy and showed up your butt hole. He knows what caused his cancer. He just recently died from it.
***********
If your judgment is as bad as your mouth, you’re in trouble. Thinking that A is the cause of B just because A is before B is not science. Do you believe that, because people drank milk when they were kids, milk was the cautheir death? death?
No, not science, BUT, when enough b’s happen after taking a’s, th3n a pattern starts to emerge that bears serious scrutiny because a very well could be causing b
I don’t have time to correct you.
I think I’ve seen around enough that you’re not a troll, but you’re quite wrong.
Professional number crunches have been pulling the cancer incidence rates since the jabs, and they are spiking only after the jabs.
Secondly, the cancer rates are up, by several sigma compared to the variation in rates, from the decade before the jabs, among the 15-44 year old cohort, who usually don’t get cancer at all.
Also, the cancers which do appear, often show up as suddenly stagev4, disseminated throughout the body, in a matter of weeks after the jab: much faster progression than before.
Finally,there are multiple biochemical mechanisms by which the jabs can cause cancer.
This isn’t crazies selling supplements to prevent imaginary future side effects the $hot $hill$ claim: this is people addressing
an observed retrospective trend which has already been observed epidemiologically.