Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: dynachrome

I read it over 50 years ago. I remember it being engaging enough but confusing — and not only because the author was being artsy, but because he was writing subversive literature in Stalinist Russia, and he probably didn’t want a bullet in the back of his head. Everything is highly metaphorical and allegorical and draped in mystery and inference. The Minitrue commissars hated it but at least they didn’t shoot him. It was more decoding than I was interested in (or up to) at that point. I might reread it just to see if it all makes sense now given over 50 years practice, which it might.


8 posted on 04/01/2024 10:36:57 AM PDT by sphinx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: sphinx

I’d like to think that in some small part Bulgakov wrote M&M as a means of crucifying the Chekists responsible for censoring it. Imagine their pleasure explaining the book to Comrade Stalin.


23 posted on 04/01/2024 2:33:11 PM PDT by Chewbarkah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson