My point is, that it's commonplace to marginalize those who get to close to the truth.
Are you also aware that Lyndon LaRouche began in far-left politics in the 1940s and later supported the Civil Rights movement, but in the 1970s he moved to the far-right.
Wikipedia, had it been around in his early days, would have praised him, now they must marginalize him. Just saying, conspiracies do happen, but the way to combat exposure is to belittle conspiracies as being the ruminations of crazy people, and that anyone buying onto them are stupid. Which is why conspiracy theories have been demonized.
If you think that conspiracies are nonsense, then explain why the RICO laws exist on the books. It's because they are based upon nonspiritual acts of lawlessness activity by more than one entity or person.
These conspirators exist in gangs, criminal enterprises, and yes even governments.
“If you think that conspiracies are nonsense, then explain why the RICO laws exist on the books.”
Your points bear no improvement on Lyndon LaRoche’s history spewing unproven, and proven false, conspiracy theories. It was his stock in trade for fundraising for his own organization, which paid him well, while ignorant volunteers were out there doing most the fundraising.
It has been about 10 years since I last saw some LaRouche’ies
I dont really mind them. the last time they setup a table on a sidewalk in front of the parking lot of a large grocery store chain.
I tried to talk to them and they were extremely confused that I knew who they were and who Lynden was, and when they tried to pull the “God save the Queen” thing I flipped them a Silver Eagle.
The time before that there was a kinda cute girl passing out flyers in front of the post office. No Tats, but full armpit hair, probably plenty down below too, but my name is not Laz
Political party
Democratic (after 1979)
U.S. Labor (1973–1979)
Socialist Workers (1949–1964)
Movement LaRouche movement