Posted on 03/29/2024 1:32:43 PM PDT by ransomnote
I think this is worth investigating, as are other cancer treatments, preferrably before one ever gets a cancer diagnosis. It would be nice to weigh the assertions and treatment options when you don't have 'flesh in the game.' In the event that you or a loved one get a diagnosis, you have some background information and don't have to plow through recommendations from the ground up, while weighing opinions and 2nd opinions on an urgent basis.
If you are young it might help. but it totally destroys your immune system. I've seen it in dozens of older people. They go through chemo and in just a little while it comes back with a vengence.
Experts Discover Over 200 Billion DNA Fragments in a Single Dose of Pfizer’s COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine
expose-news.co ^ | 3/27/2024 |
The Exposé
Posted on 3/29/2024, 11:21:39 AM by ransomnote
Experts Discover Over 200Billion DNA Fragments in a Single Dose of Pfizer’s COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine By The Exposé on March 27, 2024 •
Cancer genomics expert Dr. Phillip Buckhaults recently testified to the South Carolina Senate about the DNA contamination found in Pfizer’s mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. There are an estimated 200 billion pieces of plasmid DNA in each dose of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine, he said. These pieces of DNA are packaged in lipid nanoparticles, basically a synthetic virus, and are delivered into vaccinees’ cells.
Dr. Phillip Buckhaults is a Professor at the University of South Carolina. He has a PhD in biochemistry and molecular biology and conducts cancer genomics research. What that effectively means is he and his team are specialists at detecting foreign pieces of DNA in places where they are not supposed to be.
On 12 September, he testified before the South Carolina Senate Medical Affairs Ad-Hoc Committee on the Department of Health and Environmental Control (“DHEC”).
“The Pfizer vaccine is contaminated with plasmid DNA. It’s not just mRNA, it’s got bits of DNA in it.” Prof. Buckhaults said.
“A colleague who was in charge of the vaccination programme in Columbia, South Carolina, kept all the Pfizer vials, containing remnants of the contents, from the two batches that were used. From the remnants, Prof. Buckhaults sequenced all the DNA that was in these vials. “I can see what’s in [the vaccines] and it’s surprising that there’s any DNA in there. And you can kind of work out what it is and how it got there and I’m kind of alarmed about the possible consequences of this both in terms of human health and biology,” he said.
“This DNA, in my view, it could be causing some of the rare, but serious, side effects like death from cardiac arrest.
“This DNA can and likely will integrate into the genomic DNA of cells that got transfected with the vaccine mix … we do this in the lab all the time; we take pieces of DNA, we mix them up with a lipid complex, like the Pfizer vaccine is in, we pour it onto cells and a lot of it gets into the cells. And a lot of it gets into the DNA of those cells and it becomes a permanent fixture of the cell. It’s not just a temporary thing. It is in that cell from now on and all of its progeny from now on and forever more … So, that’s why I’m kind of alarmed about this DNA being in the vaccine. It’s different from RNA because it can be permanent.”
Based on solid molecular biology, it is a theoretical but reasonable concern that this DNA could cause a sustained autoimmune attack towards that tissue, he said.
“It’s also a very real theoretical risk of future cancer in some people. Depending on where in the genome this foreign piece of DNA lands it can interrupt a tumour suppressor or activate an oncogene,” he added. “I think it’ll be rare but I think the risk is not zero.”
“DNA is a long-lived,” Prof. Buckhaults explained. “What you were born with you’re going to die with and pass on to your kids. DNA lasts for hundreds of thousands of years … So, alterations to the DNA – they stick around.”
Prof. Buckhaults explained that there are a LOT of pieces of DNA in Pfizer’s vaccines. Although some are 5,000 and 500 base pairs long, most of the pieces are around 100 base pairs. But this is irrelevant because the probability of a piece of DNA integrating into the human genome is unrelated to its size. “Your genome risk is just a function of how many particles there are,” he said. “All these little pieces of DNA that are in the vaccine [give] many many thousands of opportunities to modify a cell of a vaccinated person.”
“The pieces are very small because during the process they chopped them up to try to make them go away – but they actually increased the hazard of genome modification in the process.”
Prof. Buckhaults’ team took all these little pieces of DNA and “glued them together” to try to establish its source. After putting together 100,000 pieces of DNA they were able to establish it came from a plasmid that can be purchased online from Agilent, a Californian life sciences company which was established in 1999 as a spin-off from Hewlett Packard.
“It’s clear that Pfizer took this plasmid and then they cloned spike into it and they used it in a process … where you feed an RNA polymerase, this plasmid, and it makes a whole bunch of mRNA copies … and then you take this mRNA and you mix it with the lipid nanoparticle transfection agent and now you’ve got your mRNA vaccine. But they failed to get the DNA out before they did this … they did make some effort to chop it up so all these little pieces of the plasma got packaged in with the RNA. That’s clear as day what happened just from the forensics of looking at the DNA sequencing,” Prof. Buckhaults said.
He explained that this process was not the same as the process that was in the vaccines used to gain emergency authorisation (“EUA”). So, there was no DNA in the batches used for the trials before the mass COVID-19 injection campaigns. The problem with DNA contamination only occurred when Pfizer scaled up production for the administration of millions/billions of doses to the public after it had gained EUA.
“We can quantify how much of this [DNA] is in a vaccine … I estimate that there were about two billion copies of the one piece [of the plasmid] that we’re looking for in every dose … If you see two billion copies of [one piece] … [then] there’s probably about 200 billion of pieces of this plasmid DNA in each dose of the vaccine,”
Prof. Buckhaults said:
The hundreds of billions of pieces of plasmid DNA are encapsulated in the lipid nanoparticles so it’s ready to be delivered into the cell. “This is a bad idea,” he said. “[The DNA is] basically packaged in a synthetic virus able to dump its contents into a cell.”
He recommended that some vaccinated people be tested to see if the plasmid DNA is integrating into their genomes. This harm you can prove. With other vaccine harms you can be suspicious because of the timing but you can’t really prove it. “This one you can prove it because it leaves a calling card. [If] you find it in the stem cells of harmed people, it’s equivalent to finding a certain type of lead in someone who is now dead, it’s pretty reasonable to assume that that’s what caused it,” he said.
Recent breakthroughs in chemotherapy for an Agent Orange cancer (multiple myeloma) has allowed my brother to extend his life dramatically.
So if you have, say pancreatic cancer, and they are able to perform surgery (which is about 15% of cases.). And then, they tell you after rearranging your guts you should get 12 rounds of the most horrible chemotherapy…you should say “no”?
I don’t think many people are going to pass on that.
In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Conspiracies, Cancer, Chemotherapy and Kate, rexthecat wrote: Recent breakthroughs in chemotherapy for an Agent Orange cancer (multiple myeloma) has allowed my brother to extend his life dramatically.
That's good to hear. I assume that there are good drugs and bad drugs, just as there are good vaccines, and bad 'vaccines'. I think that's why we would benefit by checking that out early. Congrats on your brother's 'extension'!
ransomnote wrote: “I think this is worth investigating, as are other cancer treatments, preferrably before one ever gets a cancer diagnosis. It would be nice to weigh the assertions and treatment options when you don’t have ‘flesh in the game.’ In the event that you or a loved one get a diagnosis, you have some background information and don’t have to plow through recommendations from the ground up, while weighing opinions and 2nd opinions on an urgent basis.”
There are so many different kinds of cancers. The cancer can be in different stages. The types of threatments may vary widely. That makes it very difficult to make these assessments. You would almost have to become an oncologist.
As a five year stage 3 stomach cancer survivor i think this is HORSESHIT that anyone of intelligence should totally ignore.
And no, I will not debunk nonsense.
It happened to my mom.
‘I know what you mean Vern.’
I would be careful with chemo and do research before taking it. It is effective in certain blood cancers and may be of some benefit in others. A decade ago my doctor said I had suspicious lung nodules (I’m a very heavy smoker) and a growth in my colon. The stool test for aberrant cells was positive and they wanted to remove my large intestine. I decline and started taking various anticancer herbs and supplements. So far so good. The growth in my colon has remained the same size for 10 years and the nodules in my lungs also remained the same size with one disappearing altogether. Personally I think all the anticancer supplements I take are just as effective as chemo without the side effects.
I don’t have a piece of paper with the letters “M.D.” by my name, but I do have a family history of cancer on both sides. But from observation of those family members, I’ve come to the conclusion that chermo prolongs death, not life.
The family members who received chemo / radiation / cobalt lived about 6 months longer on average than those who didn’t. (If they outlived them at all). Their suffering was horrible and heartbreaking to see.
In the event that I too develop cancer, I’m going with Ivermectin. Big Pharma and the rest of the Medical-Industrial Complex can kiss my ass.
Agree, my sister in law diagnosed with stage 4 breast cancer. Chemotherapy was tough but it worked. Been about 3 years now...she’s thriving.
BS article.
There’s a great deal of research and knowledge that is intentionally kept out of the mainstream.
Expect an attempt to “debunk” it at some point.
This doctor lives in England.
Here in the U.S., breast cancer patients don't receive chemotherapy unless certain factors are present that determine chemo will significantly improve their odds of survival.
My guess is the same is true in England. This doctor seems to be playing with numbers and twisting information.
Congrats on the five-year mark. Some patients need chemo. I was/am one of them.
The cure is surgery. But, after the surgeon removes the visible cancer, the remaining cancer cells must be destroyed, unless there’s evidence the cancer has not spread.
Kate Middleton is receiving “adjuvant” (preventative) therapy, which means the cancer cells might’ve spread, even if her cancer is early-stage.
What are your anticancer supplements, if you don’t mind sharing?
TIA.
Bttt
It would take too long to list them all but here is some of them. It became too time consuming (and expensive) to take them all every day so some I only take sporadically.
Green tea extract, curcumin, grape seed extract, dandelion extract, SeMSC selenium, feverfew extract (for parthenolide), licorice root, Indian long pepper, noni extract, vitamin E tocotrienol, bitter melon, AMLA (Indian gooseberry), Andrographis, olive leaf extract and/or extra virgin olive oil, Rabdosia rubescens, melatonin (at night), and a bunch of other things I can’t remember offhand. If I was diagnosed with cancer I would take 800 mgs of cimetidine a day. I’m also a daily user of marijuana which has some anticancer effects though I’m thinking of getting off that because of its negative side effects.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.