Bkmk
They’ve always been so proud of the story of Galileo. The brave scientist, not afraid to tell the truth in the face of the Establishment that is focused on old ideas with which they feel comfortable.
Science has totally lost its way.
Lysenkoism, pure and simple.
Cureus belongs to the Springer Nature Group.
The majority shareholders of Springer Nature Group are Holtzbrink Publishing Group (Germany) and BC Partners (UK).
Nuff said.
*PING*
Thanks, Adder.
Someone insert that “Brought to you by Pfizer” clip of all the talking heads fainting on the air.
Adder wrote: “Not a surprise anymore. Science is no longer “science”. Its all agenda driven indoctrination.”
Actually, you can say that about anything published by RFK jr., website. Especially anything authored by the grifters McCullough and Kirsch.
The Editors-in-Chief have retracted this article. Following publication, concerns were raised regarding a number of claims made in this article. Upon further review, the Editors-in-Chief found that the conclusions of this narrative review are considered to be unreliable due to the concerns with the validity of some of the cited references that support the conclusions and a misrepresentation of the cited references and available data.
And the reputation of the journal will now suffer. When any publication puts the views of its advertisers over the content of the publication, its reputation suffers.
The Left — and many on the Right — don’t really believe in science; they believe in scientists (most always a scientist who supports their opinion; a scientist who is their “favorite”)
Not only with Covid and the *vaccine* fiasco, foregoing long term testing, redefining the word *vaccine*, etc, but it’s also seen in all this transgender crap, and alleged climate catastrophe nonsense.
It’s EVERYWHERE these days. The left has succeed in destroying Science and facts.
Now 2 + 2 = whatever they say it does.
FTA :
“McCullough said research integrity staffer Tim Kersjes at Springer Nature, which publishes Cureus, last week informed the authors that the journal was retracting the paper. Kersjes raised eight points of concern, which McCullough said the authors had previously addressed in an exhaustive peer-review process.”
“The letter from Kersjes specified concerns with claims the authors made about all-cause mortality data, Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) data, the number of deaths from vaccination versus lives saved, possible vaccine contamination, their assertion that the vaccines did not undergo proper safety and efficacy testing, the “incorrect” statement that spike proteins linger in the body and can cause adverse effects and that the vaccines are gene therapy products.”
______________________________________________
Okay, so somehow, despite all of these problems, the paper made it through peer review and got published.
Right. Yeah. Sure.
Really doesn’t say much about the peers who reviewed the paper or Cureus for publishing it.
So how many other papers published by Cureus have errors? I mean if they let one paper slip through with so many errors, what else slipped through?