Posted on 02/29/2024 3:17:21 AM PST by Adder
Sod off, Swampy.
There was a post from Google’s Gemini AI which literally told someone that 2+3=4.
Yeah, but you’re a shill and a troll.
Your supposed “trust” is entirely worthless.
Message received. I understand you do not trust dissenting professional opinions - most who encourage open scientific debate - who disagree with pharma, MSM and government.
Okay. So.... I guess keep trusting MSM, big pharma, and government with saying that is what you are betting your health and life on.
week 71 wrote: “Message received. I understand you do not trust dissenting professional opinions - most who encourage open scientific debate - who disagree with pharma, MSM and government.”
There has been a small group that have opposed vaccines since the first vaccinations against small pox. Their arguments haven’t changed. Then it was vaccines can turn your into a cow, now it’s vaccines alter your DNA. Then it was vaccines contain bat fecces, not it’s vaccines contain poisons. Today’s anti-vaxxers are just an extention of years past.
Here’s a simple question for you: why do believe that hundreds of thousands of healthcare professionals would be a part of a conspiracy to kill millions?
‘Todays antivaxxers are an extension of the past’. The doctors skeptical of the jabs vaccinated their patients with traditional vaccines. Some even took the jabs, gave it to their families - and with more information regret it.
I would not believe any healthcare professional who knowingly lied to my face - which you seem to. And yes, I am less inclined to put my trust in healthcare providers since most are either to incompetent to research an experimental medicine before giving to patients. Or they know all the crap, do not give informed consent, and live for the money.
FTA :
“McCullough said research integrity staffer Tim Kersjes at Springer Nature, which publishes Cureus, last week informed the authors that the journal was retracting the paper. Kersjes raised eight points of concern, which McCullough said the authors had previously addressed in an exhaustive peer-review process.”
“The letter from Kersjes specified concerns with claims the authors made about all-cause mortality data, Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) data, the number of deaths from vaccination versus lives saved, possible vaccine contamination, their assertion that the vaccines did not undergo proper safety and efficacy testing, the “incorrect” statement that spike proteins linger in the body and can cause adverse effects and that the vaccines are gene therapy products.”
______________________________________________
Okay, so somehow, despite all of these problems, the paper made it through peer review and got published.
Right. Yeah. Sure.
Really doesn’t say much about the peers who reviewed the paper or Cureus for publishing it.
So how many other papers published by Cureus have errors? I mean if they let one paper slip through with so many errors, what else slipped through?
week 71 wrote: “I would not believe any healthcare professional who knowingly lied to my face...”
but you believe the anti-vaxxers who lie to your face?
The jab pushers have done more damage to general vaccine uptake than any anti-vaxer has. They will never admit it.
Re: 23 - agreed.
Over the past several months, the COVID-19 threads are slowly winding down based on a quick search. When there are threads, there seem to be less posts per thread. Much of it is from posters that personally criticize other posters for not agreeing with them.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.