The possibility of the clot shot is conspicuous in its absence. Not even mentioned as a distant, remote possibility.
Especially since multiple other potential causes were considered and discarded.
“The possibility of the clot shot is conspicuous in its absence. Not even mentioned as a distant, remote possibility.”
Maybe she didn’t take them so they were not an issue.
She had a history of heart problems in the family along with epilepsy and had shown symptoms less than a year before her death. Not everything that happens can be blamed on the vaccinations.
And, the article lost me when they called it a possible “epileptic ‘fit’. The proper term is seizure and what they are describing is a grand mal seizure, not petit mal. They need to do their research and stop throwing manure around.
wy69
“The possibility of the clot shot is conspicuous in its absence. Not even mentioned as a distant, remote possibility.”
Maybe she didn’t take them so they were not an issue.
She had a history of heart problems in the family along with epilepsy and had shown symptoms less than a year before her death. Not everything that happens can be blamed on the vaccinations.
And, the article lost me when they called it a possible “epileptic ‘fit’. The proper term is seizure and what they are describing is a grand mal seizure, not petit mal. They need to do their research and stop throwing manure around.
wy69
The possibility of the clot shot is conspicuous in its absence.
\/
the vax that must not be named anymore.