“I’m not suggesting any particular cause of death. I am suggesting that based on cardio problems in Jabbed people of her age, that under the described circumstances it should have gotten a mention - been considered as a possible.”
And that’s my point. You aren’t suggesting any possible cause for death but you are suggesting a possible cause of death. So why bring it up as a cause of death when it may not apply at all? You could have said there are rampant aircraft crashes there and it would have been the same thing. It just seems like every time someone dies it always have to have someone bring up the shots whether they took them or not as that is unknown.
wy69
Read my sentence again. I am not suggesting any PARTICULAR cause of death, only things that should/could be considered as possibilities.
Why bring anything up since anything may not apply? Is that your reasoning?
The list of news stories about sudden, unexplained deaths that mention the Jab are essentially non existent. It is admitted to cause cardio issues in certain age groups (like hers). Logically it would be mentioned in a few of the hundreds of articles on sudden death. Yet is never is even remotely considered. Why is it completely ignored? They seem to dredge up any other remote possibility.
The Dog That Did Not Bark. Conspicuous by its absence.