[Political Junkie Too]

I don't even think it was the refresh rates, it's that they needed to interlace the two eye videos. LCD screens didn't use interlace technologies; that was a CRT thing.

Some of that old software still works on my laptop, but with anaglyph images.

-PJ

[fireman15]

I don't even think it was the refresh rates, it's that they needed to interlace the two eye videos.

I was not using interlacing on the monitor that I used with them. I had the video card set for progressive video at a fast refresh rate where every other frame was for the other eye. The shutters merely blacked out one eye and then the other.

I suppose that it was possible that some setups did use interlacing, my monitor was compatible of a high enough refresh rate that this was not necessary or desirable.