Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: BipolarBob

I asked ChatGPT to critique this work. I was somewhat impressed with the results.


Your short sci-fi story is intriguing and presents a thought-provoking perspective on the exploration of the galaxy and the relative lifespans of alien races. Here are some observations and suggestions:

Engaging Concept: The concept of exploring the galaxy and cataloging different sentient races, especially the twist with the short-lived Humans, adds an interesting layer to the narrative. It prompts readers to reflect on the potential consequences of factors like lifespan on the survival of a species.

Dialogue: The dialogue between the characters effectively conveys information and progresses the story. The interaction between the explorer and the superior officer maintains a professional tone, enhancing the futuristic setting.

Pacing: The pacing is well-managed, with the revelation of various sentient races and the focus on the short-lived Humans providing a sense of discovery. The pause before revealing the name of the extinct race adds a dramatic touch.

Characterization: While the characters are not extensively described, the short exchange gives a sense of the explorer’s efficiency and the superior officer’s curiosity. Consider adding a bit more depth to their personalities to further engage the reader.

Details: The story contains sufficient details about the different races and their fates. However, you might consider expanding on the characteristics of the coherent magnetic field race that can only survive in a star, providing a richer background.

Grammar and Punctuation: The story is generally well-written, but there are a few minor grammatical issues. For example, in the line “there was archeological evidence,” it should be “there were archaeological evidence.” Also, “emergint” should be corrected to “emerging.”

Ending: The ending leaves the reader curious and wanting more, creating an effective hook. It sets the stage for potential follow-up reports about the two intriguing races mentioned.

Overall, your short sci-fi story is captivating and well-executed. With some minor adjustments and additional details, it has the potential to become an even more immersive and thought-provoking narrative. Great job!


42 posted on 01/13/2024 6:52:31 PM PST by Lazamataz (Laz 2005: "First, we beat the Soviet Union. Then we became them.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]


To: Lazamataz

Yeah I started to write that too but I sort of got distracted
When he threw that barb at you. I’ve threatened to turn down his voltage when gets too chippy.


44 posted on 01/13/2024 6:57:40 PM PST by BipolarBob (My investment choice for 2024 is pre-ban menthol cigarettes. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

To: Lazamataz

It does poorly with grammar.


50 posted on 01/13/2024 7:17:15 PM PST by ConservativeMind (Trump: Befuddling Democrats, Republicans, and the Media for the benefit of the US and all mankind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

To: Lazamataz

“I wouldn’t go to earth if you paid me ten billion gansars, or offered me the choicest of your slaves. But I would go to Bontalu-6. Do I need to say why?”

“No, I totally get it. The elosans of Bontalu-6, nothing beats that.”


60 posted on 01/13/2024 7:46:33 PM PST by Peter ODonnell (Prayers up for Jim Robinson and family ... an island of sanity in a sea of madness. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

To: Lazamataz

That is interesting that critique by ChatGPT. I might have to submit some stuff my daughter wrote years ago. I had always hoped she would grow up to write stuff. I guess there is still a chance.


76 posted on 01/14/2024 12:24:23 AM PST by 21twelve (Ever Vigilant. Never Fearful.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

To: Lazamataz
“there was archeological evidence,” it should be “there were archaeological evidence.” Also, “emergint” should be corrected to “emerging.”

No wonder the humans died out. They let their fledgling AI run the whole place before they did the necessary adjustments and fine tuning.

But may that is right. "There are no evidence of widespread voter fraud" could be correct even if the "there is no evidence" has been falsified a gazillion times.

98 posted on 01/14/2024 8:34:58 AM PST by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson