Posted on 12/21/2023 7:53:26 AM PST by fireman15
NZ data shows up to 20% higher mortality for males that declines after each shot. How can there be such a large dose dependency if the shot is safe?
We've always known that the Pfizer COVID vaccine kills disproportionately more males than females. Thanks to Barry Young, we can now confirm this effect in the NZ data.
I’ve known for a long time that the Pfizer COVID vaccine kills disproportionately more males than females. Females are disproportionately injured, but males disproportionately die.
This post covers two different effects: 1) an effect whereby males die at a higher rate than females for early doses and 2) an effect whereby people die at an accelerated rate after getting the COVID vaccine. The first effect is relatively small compared to the second effect.
Effect #1: A gender analysis of the New Zealand data shows an alarmingly higher rate of mortality of males within 120 days after the first two shots compared to after 120 days in the same cohort. The effect diminishes after the 3rd shot and is gone by the time the 4th shot comes around. The difference is statistically significant. If the vaccine is safe, the mortality after a shot should NOT be dependent on the dose number!
Effect #2: I’ll show you that when deaths are DECLINING in New Zealand, if you got one of those COVID shots, your death rate INCREASES over time. You are basically increasing your chances of dying with additional shots, which is the opposite of what they told you.
(Excerpt) Read more at kirschsubstack.com ...
Warning: If you’re hosting NZ “whistleblower data” on your server, you’re at risk of losing EVERYTHING…
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/4202041/posts
NZ Vaccine Data Whistleblower Could Face up to 7 Years in Prison
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/4201766/posts
Of course, the Covidiots still active here will respond with their normal name calling etc... If these guys are not credible why are governments going to such radical measures to keep the data under wraps?
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/4202041/posts
NZ Vaccine Data Whistleblower Could Face up to 7 Years in Prison
The vaccines have turned out to be a massive farce. I watched what happened the fall of 2021 after a year of vaccinations, covid cases skyrocketed. Covid deaths shot up in SK and other highly vaccinated countries.
And my wife told me this morning her sister got the flu and covid booster this week.
So males are getting “weeded out” by the first 2 shots and aren’t around to drop dead from later shots?
The headline is worded a bit confusingly. Going by wording, it implies that men have a 20$ higher mortality after the first injection, but that with each subsequent injection that mortality risk declines i.e. the risk drops. However, the article seems to be saying that each subsequent injection exacerbates the mortality risk (which would make sense).
Why can’t it be blamed on Climate Change? everything else is.
However, the article seems to be saying that each subsequent injection exacerbates the mortality risk (which would make sense).
~~~
Yes, Very poorly written.
I think you might be interpretting it right.
20% risk from the first one, but (as an example) and 15% risk is suffered from the second one. Then perhaps a %10 risk from the third. In other words, your risk doesn’t go down, its just that each booster offers some risk but not as much as the first shot.
One study I saw, which reviewed data on four thousand people, and only looked at those who had gotten the fourth booster. Their all-cause death rate dropped for three months, then spiked well above the all-cause rate of those who had not gotten a fourth booster.
This mRNA approach is like smacking the side of a tube television to improve the picture. Sometimes it works and no one knows why. Sometimes it doesn’t.
Sounds like the men who a vulnerable to the shot die off early and those that don’t have problems, don’t have problems ever, with the shot. Hence why the rate of bad effects tapers off.
As for men vs women, men tend to have thicker blood due to testosterone and more prone to serious problems with blot clots.
fireman15 wrote: “Of course, the Covidiots still active here will respond with their normal name calling etc...”
Then you must be a ‘Covidiot’ since you’re the one calling names.
Death by design.
“Warning: If you’re hosting NZ “whistleblower data” on your server, you’re at risk of losing EVERYTHING…”
Anyone trying to enforce Kiwi censorship and tyranny in the USA is also at risk of losing everything. Quickly and loudly.
I now know who the enemy really is: the covidiots still active here. It isn’t the mainstream press or the social media corporations who have all the power, it’s the covidiots still active here that are the greatest threat. It’s not the Democrats or the RINO establishment who are the ones to watch out for, or the liberals driving around in Subarus, it’s the covidiots still active here. Thanks for setting me straight!
What idiots. What a nothingburger.They should have known to exercise and go on cruises.If they did that, their risk would have been nothing burger zero. #covidiot wisdom
“The headline is worded a bit confusingly.”
LOL! Ya THINK?
Except that no one can prove the mRNA shots work other than causing turbo cancers, strokes, extreme cell development inside blood vessels, and myocarditis.
Effect #1: A gender analysis of the New Zealand data shows an alarmingly higher rate of mortality of males within 120 days after the first two shots compared to after 120 days in the same cohort. The effect diminishes after the 3rd shot and is gone by the time the 4th shot comes around. The difference is statistically significant. If the vaccine is safe, the mortality after a shot should NOT be dependent on the dose number!
I assume it diminishes because the first dose killed off the weakest first. They cannot die again.
“Except that no one can prove the mRNA shots work other than causing turbo cancers, strokes, extreme cell development inside blood vessels, and myocarditis.”
Actually, from the papers it appears there is some short-term benefit in some cases. Various cohorts have a temporary drop in all-cause mortality, but then it picks up significantly. So, they do work, but the benefit is probably not worth the cost. Probably some people who might have died won’t. But it appears many more who would not have died did. The continent doing the best is the one that was least vaccinated, Africa.
This can’t be accurate.
We have it under good authority, the best authority, that the “three vaccines all are very, very good”, “beautiful vaccines”,”one of the greatest achievements of mankind”.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.