Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Libertarian: Ohtani Signs as a Tax Dodger
NY Post ^ | December 18, 2023 | By Post Editorial Board

Posted on 12/18/2023 6:22:06 PM PST by Oldeconomybuyer

Baseball superstar Shohei Ohtani “will collect $2 million in each of the next 10 years” from the LA Dodgers, notes Reason’s Eric Boehm, with the other $68 million of Ohtani’s yearly salary being “deferred for a decade.”

“The Dodgers will owe it to him in annual installments starting in 2034.” Why? “California has the country’s highest state income tax rates,” so “Ohtani could save as much as $98 million” if “he relocates out of California by 2034.”

And the Dodgers might also reduce their own tax burden” by dodging the “MLB’s so-called ‘luxury tax’ ” that limits “how much money richer clubs spend on players.” Proving “teams will find new ways to sign expensive ballplayers,” and “wealthy people will find ways to avoid earning money in California.”

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Sports
KEYWORDS: baseball; ohtanidodgers; taxes

1 posted on 12/18/2023 6:22:06 PM PST by Oldeconomybuyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Bad decision by Ohtani and his agent. He should have taken more money up front and deferred less later. Upcoming hyperinflation is going eat away most of his $700 million contract.

2 posted on 12/18/2023 6:30:31 PM PST by Right_Wing_Madman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

And the Dodgers might also reduce their own tax burden” by dodging the “MLB’s so-called ‘luxury tax’ ” that limits “how much money richer clubs spend on players.” Proving “teams will find new ways to sign expensive ballplayers,”


That’s the difference between the MLB and the NFL as well as the NHL which have hard salary caps. You cannot offer a contract in the NFL or NHL which has future benefits in them that cannot be counted against the salary cap when the player is no longer with the team.


3 posted on 12/18/2023 6:31:51 PM PST by God luvs America (63.5 million pay no income tax and vote for DemoKrats...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Aren’t taxes due in the year of earnings? IOW, would he not owe the same amount of taxes in each of the next 10 years, regardless of deferment to 2034 and later? And, wouldn’t he still own the California taxes regardless of where ho moves to after his playing days?


4 posted on 12/18/2023 6:35:28 PM PST by adorno (CCH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Good for him, at least for now at any rate. But Ca. will find some way to make sure they get their unfair share.


5 posted on 12/18/2023 6:36:46 PM PST by Robert DeLong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

$700 million to shake a stick at a ball for some years?

Endtimes! LOL.


6 posted on 12/18/2023 6:41:11 PM PST by Moltke (Reasoning with a liberal is like watering a rock in the hope to grow a building.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Right_Wing_Madman

That’s my take too. Taxes may never be as “low” as they are now with hyperinflation and exploding debt service costs.


7 posted on 12/18/2023 6:43:07 PM PST by Oldeconomybuyer (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: adorno
Aren’t taxes due in the year of earnings?

If they pay him in 2034, he earned it in 2034.

8 posted on 12/18/2023 6:44:15 PM PST by Toddsterpatriot (TANSTAAFL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Right_Wing_Madman

Maybe, but he’s been making something like $50 million/yr endorsements for Angels, and likely will double that as a Dodger. That $680 mil deferred means he can afford to gamble on future taxes and inflation.


9 posted on 12/18/2023 6:47:42 PM PST by jjotto ( Blessed are You LORD, who crushes enemies and subdues the wicked.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
If they pay him in 2034, he earned it in 2034.

Yeah, but, what he gets in 2034 would be back-due earnings. so, technically, he's getting paid what he earned in 2024-20whatever. I'm sure that democrats, especially those in California, want him to 'pay his fair share' with no trickery.
10 posted on 12/18/2023 7:05:36 PM PST by adorno (CCH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: adorno
Yeah, but, what he gets in 2034 would be back-due earnings

Earnings are the year you're paid.

11 posted on 12/18/2023 7:29:46 PM PST by Toddsterpatriot (TANSTAAFL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

Study up on the “doctrine of constructive receipt”.
I think this guy’s agent, and lawyer and accountant know how to structure the deal to DEFER the income and the taxes.
It is downright amazing how cleverly some of the deals can be.


12 posted on 12/18/2023 9:20:37 PM PST by Honest Nigerian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Right_Wing_Madman

For luxury tax purposes, the contract is valued at $460 million.


13 posted on 12/18/2023 9:42:42 PM PST by TBP (Decent people cannot fathom the amoral cruelty of the Biden regime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Right_Wing_Madman

He’ll make at least that much in endorsements over 10 years - though if done right he can minimize his taxes on that endorsement money too. The deferred money will earn interest held in escrow. It’s like annuity for him. He’ll make plenty now and pay taxes on some of that now. Then he’ll move and collect a lot more without tax for another 10 years, when his endorsement income will start to wane.


14 posted on 12/19/2023 2:18:33 AM PST by monkeyshine (live and let live is dead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

I wonder if that current SCOTUS case will have an adverse effect on this scheme


15 posted on 12/19/2023 6:16:54 AM PST by 11th_VA (<>< Good News: Barbarians at not at the gate; Bad News: They’re in the city)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson