What underlying conditions did the child have? She had reactions after the first vaccines according to the parents, and appears to have had reactions after the second. Most people don’t have reactions, so I will be curious to see updates on what was wrong with the child. Resuming that there is a clear underlying condition, then future parents can be warned that if their child has some conditions, they need to approach vaccinations differently.
Check your premise!
Regards,
My son had a severe reaction to his DTP at 2 months. Raised super welt at the site of the vaccination, covered almost his whole thigh. He screamed and cried for hours, was inconsolable. The doctor advised Tylenol and cool packs on the welt, which I had already been doing. Next step was no more pertussis vaccines. Marked on his chart. He got his MMR, and the diphtheria and tetanus parts of the vaccines as scheduled after that. No more problems.
That was over 35 years ago. I can so feel this mother’s pain.
True. But you are posting in conspiracy central, (The old FR site)...So don’t be surprised at the responses you’ll receive :)
Today’s parents need to revisit the list of vaccinations that children received in the early 1960’s, and agree to only the vaccines on that list. Nothing more.
Fever and rash are common after a vaccination shot, and still, parents are pushed to stick to a brutal vaccination schedule for their little ones. Back when I had babies, the schedule was 15-16 shots by age two. Some of those shots were combos, such as DTaP, and given every few months. I was criticized for slowing down the schedule. Then, after some confusion with their vaccination records at the doctor’s office, I finally put the brakes on, even though the doctor yelled at me in front of my children. Sadly, most doctors and other people shrug off the cases of children harmed or worse by shots.