[Parmy]

I would think that after 60 years that, if this is so deadly, all the fish would be long gone. More spitting into the wind by California communists.

[verum ago]

I would think that after 60 years that, if this is so deadly, all the fish would be long gone. More spitting into the wind by California communists.

Well, they've been struggling consistently for that long. Not an endorsement of their case, just an observation.

As with anything in toxicology, dosis sola facit venenum: 'the dose makes the poison.

Is this legit, or is this one of those things where they administered gargantuan doses to some captive fish and then omitted the gargantuan part?

(as someone in the business of raising Pacific Salmon and dealing with the frustration of them not recovering like other protected species, I'm interested in knowing more than this horribly biased article tells)

Honestly, I'm kind of rooting for this to be true- getting Pacific salmon species to recover has been an exercise in frustration- if a simple ingredient swap for tires is all it takes, that'd be great news. But I'm very, very suspicious of this reporting.