It appears to have some effect on something, but this study, like most, is still based on the fiction that the PCR test was able to distinguish a deadly, coronavirus-based virus with a respiratory spread.
More deflection from the truth.
The efficacy of the pcr would be the same for both those who took and did not take the treatment right? So let’s say 90% or any X% of those taking treatment were not significantly ill. Would it be a different % for those that did not?