Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: MtnClimber

Now that the Soviet Union has fallen, we need to ask what the purpose of NATO is.

Is it just an anti-Russian alliance?

If so, you can understand why Russia was concerned with NATO slowly expanding eastward.

We might say “NATO would never attack Russia”, but Russia has a long history of being attacked by its neighbors to the west. I don’t just mean WWI & WWII, I mean going back hundreds of years. It has happened over and over and over again. It’s not surprising they are paranoid about it.


11 posted on 10/30/2023 7:04:50 AM PDT by Brookhaven (Ted Cruz said Jan. 6 was terrorism; don't forget that the next time you vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Brookhaven
We might say “NATO would never attack Russia”,

NATO is attacking Russia as we speak. Those aren't Ukraine HIMARS and ATACMS hitting Russian cities and airbases.

Imagine if Mexico were launching Chinese missiles on Tinker or Ellsworth airbases, or on Omaha Nebraska, while they attempted to get back Texas.

16 posted on 10/30/2023 7:14:40 AM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson