Thanks for the article. This was a great line:
“You don’t want to be the kind of stupid that you don’t do an experiment that explores possibly new physics because you thought you knew the answer ...
That’s the kind of thinking that won Richard Feynman the Nobel Prize. He had his graduate student’s look into the source data for some textbook curves, and they (and he) could not find the experimental evidence for the low end (right side) of the curves. When they did the experiments, they found that the textbooks (and underlying theory) were wrong.
The anti-hydrogen atoms and the hydrogen atoms, were not free to decide on their own, because, they were trapped in a magnetic field which left them with no choice(s). They need to try the experiment again with no magnetism involved, since magnetism involves using regular matter. Try the experiment again with ‘anti-magnetism’ and then we can talk about whether anti-gravity exists or not.
(just nit-picking)
I’ve heard that anti-Fa doesn’t exist, that it’s a myth. Let’s have these scientists do experiments on that, and perhaps then we’ll have a definitive answer. ;)