Posted on 09/21/2023 12:40:27 PM PDT by Red Badger
When all the other explanations fail, whatever is left is often the truth.
I have yet to see anybody absolutely say the F-35 WAS NOT HACKED BY THE CHINESE.
Sitting in a Titanium Tub, the pilot wouldn’t have felt anything. But the plane’s mechanicals might have (definitely) been damaged by .50cal BMG rounds.
How do we know the pilot was a “he”?
+1
It’s GP. What do you expect?
Not guilty. Not named Tiffany. At least in date zone, possibly in wife zone.
Would be an upgrade.
We don’t.
Maybe that is one reason for them not identifying the pilot..............
Any negative that can’t be proven, must be true?
Is that what you’re saying?
“Once you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, no matter how improbable, must be the truth.” - Arthur Conan Doyle/Sherlock Holmes..................
Not guilty. Not named Tiffany. At least in date zone, possibly in wife zone.
The F-35B is the only variant of the F-35 that has an automatic ejection seat. That means that the aircraft can independently fire the ejection seat without pilot intervention if it thinks it's about to crash while in STO/VL operation.
The Martin Baker website: https://martin-baker.com/products/mk16-ejection-seat-for-f-35/
* Auto eject system: Active on STOVL variant only
What if the ejection was uncommanded while the F-35B was hovering, and the aircraft just drifted off after spitting out its pilot?
There may be a flaw in the F-35B's software code that caused this, and the Pentagon doesn't want to reveal that their entire fleet of F-35Bs could buck off their riders at any time. But they did a safety stand-down to attempt to mitigate the issue.
Slowly drifting off in a hover would also explain why:
* Local ATC couldn't track the aircraft. Normally, after the canopy is ejected, you'd think that the radar signature of the aircraft would go way up, but ATC may not track very slow moving aircraft in order to avoid ground clutter.
* A slow drift away while in hover would use up all of the fuel while only traveling 80 miles, hence no fireaball when it crashed.
* As others here have often pointed out, my theories are usually full of bovine excrement.
The militia did it! RIGHT AMAZING! ;-o
>Pilot was on a false flag mission, but did not cooperate, and foiled the FF. Possible nuclear, possible aircraft was DEW-equipped, possible destination was NO.
I heard somewhere else that the F-35 was hovering and someone shot it with a civilian gun.
I heard that as well..............
Kind like your airbag going off without a reason or just a small bump........
The pilot was identifying as a man today.......
If you listen to the recording of the EMT when he located the pilot you would understand that the pilot meant he lost sight of the airplane in the weather after he ejected. The statement was in response to the EMT asking where the airplane went.
This has been misunderstood, ballyhooed and promoted as the reason for the bail out. Arm chair quarter backs need to stay in ghe arm chair.
The transmission was not just posted by a meteorologist, it was posted by several. The one I saw and heard was linked on this forum to military.com.
This has been misconstrued and repeated out of context too many times. It really does not bear repeating. We still don’t know why the guy bailed out of a flying airplane. I think he screwed up and pulled the ejection handles somehow. Anybody that was not in the airplane, including me is just guessing though.
“He’s unsure of where his plane crashed, said he just lost it in the weather,” a voice can be heard saying of the pilot on a Charleston County Emergency Medical Services call posted Tuesday by a meteorologist.
I’m proud of my fellow patriots to see that we are beginning to establish No-Fly Zones in the US.
I figured something like that, too. But they purported that to be a photo of the crash site. It strikes me as ridiculous, too.
But it is curious there are NO photos of the crash site.
“Random tweets by goofballs on Twitter now qualify as news.”
Yep, irrelevant BS. They’re skeptical. So?
Sounds reasonable to me.
Perhaps the aircraft's AI had different ideas for the flight plan.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.