Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Libloather
Now we can more readily understand the division of the branches and why the Supreme Court has no check. You can't legislate away a decision nor can the President veto a decision.

Apparently, Biden thinks he can.

12 posted on 07/23/2023 5:15:12 PM PDT by Sacajaweau ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Sacajaweau
Now we can more readily understand the division of the branches and why the Supreme Court has no check. You can't legislate away a decision nor can the President veto a decision.

The Supreme Court used to have a significant check: the knowledge that they had no integral enforcement powers, and needed for everyone else to agree that their decisions were wise and in keeping with the Constitution.

Andrew Jackson famously demonstrated that when the Supreme Court ordered him to perform an action, and he replied "Justice Marshall has made his decision. Now let him enforce it". And Jackson could fire and replace any official who disagreed with him.

What changed since then? Civil Service laws allow bureaucrats to ignore presidential orders in favor of Supreme Court orders without fear of being fired.

56 posted on 07/24/2023 2:26:09 AM PDT by SauronOfMordor (The rot of all principle begins with a single compromise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson