I don’t believe in climate change but agree that reusable energy (yesterdays term for “sustainable energy”) is a laudable goal. But the tech isn’t there yet to transition and transitioning (out of the gutter ya filthy pervs) to these weaker reusables while ignoring nuclear is a disaster waiting to happen. (And already has in many places)
I don’t believe in climate change but agree that reusable energy (yesterdays term for “sustainable energy”) is a laudable goal.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Sure.... just makes sure that the entire scope of the implications for the alternative(s) are understood and included when the evaluation is done. So far, I haven’t seen any ‘alternatives’ that aren’t at least as bad as what they are trying to replace....
“I don’t believe in climate change but agree that reusable energy (yesterdays term for “sustainable energy”) is a laudable goal. But the tech isn’t there yet to transition and transitioning (out of the gutter ya filthy pervs) to these weaker reusables while ignoring nuclear is a disaster waiting to happen. (And already has in many places)”
The desire of the people behind this is not about climate or energy. It’s about destroying Western civilization. This is because we’ve been doing the logical thing for two thousand years and we aren’t living in a communist utopia. Therefore, we have to destroy what’s here and (a merical happens) we’ll be living in a communist utopia.