Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Long article =very believable.

i thought Diana was selected to be Charls' wife as she was young and could have children.

1 posted on 05/19/2023 8:03:24 AM PDT by sodpoodle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last
To: sodpoodle

23 and me dude!


2 posted on 05/19/2023 8:05:09 AM PDT by rktman (Destroy America from within? Check! WTH? Enlisted USN 1967 to end up with thisđź’©? đźš«đź’‰)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sodpoodle

If Harry is actually Charles’ kid, I’ll bet he would be up for a DNA test to see if they are half brothers.


3 posted on 05/19/2023 8:08:32 AM PDT by nitzy (I wonder if the telescreens in 1984 were first called "free Obamascreens")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sodpoodle

Well well, more soap opera type stories involving the Royal Family.

This could be scandalous stay tuned.


4 posted on 05/19/2023 8:09:39 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sodpoodle

Anything about king chuckie and the bride of chuckie is believable. Of course there is dna. Duh


5 posted on 05/19/2023 8:09:45 AM PDT by George J. Jetso
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sodpoodle

Diana was chosen because she was a virgin and had the right lineage.

Camilla was a commoner whom Charles fell in love with. Never gonna happen for QEII.

Only when Will came along did they adjust those rituals.


6 posted on 05/19/2023 8:09:58 AM PDT by FamiliarFace (I got my own way of livin' But everything gets done With a southern accent Where I come from. TP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sodpoodle

There was a device on the coat of arms for the son born out of wedlock, called “Bar Sinister”, which may or may not have standing in the history of heraldry.


7 posted on 05/19/2023 8:14:15 AM PDT by alloysteel (Fiction has to be at least plausible, while reality obeys no such constraint.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sodpoodle

Charles and Camilla will never submit DNA for comparison.


8 posted on 05/19/2023 8:14:30 AM PDT by HandBasketHell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sodpoodle

A DNA test should settle the matter?


9 posted on 05/19/2023 8:16:53 AM PDT by JesusIsLord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sodpoodle

He’s got that horse-faced look to match the alleged parentage.


10 posted on 05/19/2023 8:16:57 AM PDT by FlyingEagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sodpoodle

show me the ears


12 posted on 05/19/2023 8:21:04 AM PDT by llevrok (Pronouns: Me/myself/& I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sodpoodle

So William can just co right “The Spare”.


15 posted on 05/19/2023 8:23:32 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sodpoodle
The man claiming to be the secret love child of King Charles and Camilla

Why on earth would anyone want to claim this, even if it was true? I'd think that denying even the slightest relationship with these inbreds would be a lot more logical.
16 posted on 05/19/2023 8:23:54 AM PDT by AnotherUnixGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sodpoodle

“We could populate a country town with country girls who have born you sons!”—Kathrine Hepburn in THE LION IN WINTER


17 posted on 05/19/2023 8:24:32 AM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar (“No man’s life, liberty, or property are safe while the legislature is in session.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sodpoodle

This is a rather nice return to ancient traditions. Royal bastards were once SOP. Both mistresses and bastards were normal parts of the social system.

Brings a tear to my eye really.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Illegitimate_children_of_William_IV_of_the_United_Kingdom


19 posted on 05/19/2023 8:24:57 AM PDT by buwaya (Strategic imperatives )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sodpoodle

This man has spoken of this claim for decades.
Bill Clinto has a black man doing the same.
Dredlocked Rapper JaZ has a guy making similar claims.
The Prince of Monaco has more or less the same situation.

In all these cases, the alleged Baby was concieved during a one night stand situation, not even a common law wife thing.
From the four men mentioned, the Prince of Monaco is apparently the only one to step forward, claim two or three as his offspring, and I believe he has provided money for them to live on.

With the other three, nothing was promised. This was with consenting adults, and nothing is owed. I would say it was the accussed father’s choice of taking it a step further and getting DNA tests. We all know why these ‘offspring’ keep pushing for a statement of fatherhood. They want a cut of that wealth. It’s human nature and not terribly mysterious.


23 posted on 05/19/2023 8:32:05 AM PDT by lee martell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sodpoodle

*cringe*


24 posted on 05/19/2023 8:32:31 AM PDT by BigFreakinToad (Biden whispered "Don't Jump")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sodpoodle

They sure it wasn’t Bill Clinton?


27 posted on 05/19/2023 8:43:15 AM PDT by virgil (The evil that men do lives after them )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sodpoodle

28 posted on 05/19/2023 8:43:34 AM PDT by null and void (Men Are from Mars, Women Are from Venus, Wookies Are From Kashyyyk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sodpoodle
Nostradamus predicted that King Charles would step down and a man never thought to be king would lead… or something like that.
30 posted on 05/19/2023 8:46:08 AM PDT by dragonblustar (Democrats groom then butcher children and call it gender affirming. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sodpoodle
Charlie was kind of a "love child" himself.

Love child, love child, never quite as good
Afraid, ashamed, misunderstood

31 posted on 05/19/2023 8:46:26 AM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson