Not good that 13% voted woke.
I have to believe that the statement was a bit flawed: it probably should have been stated as ‘shareholders owning 87% of the Coca-cola shares voted to reject the proposal’ with no real indication of how many people were involved.
Hard to imagine 13% wanted to see the value of their investment plummet, but that’s libthink...
Fortunately no Woka-Cola for them, but how many other firms are being bullied like this and risking shareholder value?
No. But I’d never miss Coke products if they took them away.