I suppose Waypoint 6 is a trespass, strictly speaking. Even if so, it has absolutely nothing to to with the corner-crossing issue.
Seems to me that the offer to withdraw the lawsuit is telling. The landowner must be losing. But, if he gets the ruling he wants, he can salvage a win.
This is an insanity. A person can feasibly step from inside the corner of one segment of public land to another without ever touching private land. Airspace? Gimme a break. Prove the harm.
Just saying it’s a harm that devalues property is nonsense.
If a landowner forbids access, he is claiming sole ownership of public land. The judge should rule he must either pay taxes on the land or drop his nonsense suit.
Re: the waypoint alleging one of the hunters set foot on the private land.
To what degree of accuracy is the onX app?
When the waypoint was set, what was the map scale?
I have learned when using onX, I have to enlarge the map as much as possible in order to accurately mark a waypoiint.
I first heard about this from youtube:
He discusses the airspace issue, it’s actually has some precedence, but IMHO it’s total BS here.