Is the analysis software the Labbé used as good as the climate change analysis software?
Climate change science is settled. Better equipment or data does not matter at this point.
I think science still has an open mind on space exploration however.
Analysis is rarely limited by arithmetic or mathematical skill, but by the validity of one’s models. Up until around 1916, there was a persistent, but subtle anomaly in the precession of the perihelion of the orbit of Mercury, that could not be explained by Newton’s theory of gravity. When Einstein applied his new general theory of relativity (which is really a theory about gravity) he came up with precisely the correct - in the sense that it agreed with observations - result. So far General Relativity has taken everything that’s been thrown at it, and it comes up standing.
Global warming theory cannot “predict” the past, in the sense that when the equation are run backwards in time it diverges from historical measurements, and its very modest attempts at predicting the last decade of so have been utter failures. Ptolemaic astronomy has more empirical validation than global warming theory.
Keep an open mind.
My first thought was how accurate the software really is.