Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: shadowlands1960

After 1972. Seriously??? There has not been one law, statute or supreme setting precedent to alter what constitutes ‘natural born citizenship’. The founding fathers gave NONE power or authority to alter the literal meaning…

Again since the garden party humanity has seen fit to make changes that fit their own personal narrative..


51 posted on 01/30/2023 11:19:11 AM PST by Just mythoughts (Psalm 2. Why do the heathen rage, and the people imagine a vain thing?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]


To: Just mythoughts

The reason I put that addendum in is because the law was changed on conveyance of citizenship by birth... before 1972 citizenship was only conferred to children born of males overseas... after 1972 it applied also to females overseas who give birth. This mirrored changes in British law. It is also the #1 reason no one wanted to touch the issues over Obama’s ‘natural’ born citizenship.. he was born before 1972 and his father was a British subject.


56 posted on 01/30/2023 11:24:36 AM PST by shadowlands1960 (We live in a world of intolerance masked as tolerance. RUSH LIMBAUGH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson