No.
That's like asking if a dictator will obey the will of the people. A dictator wouldn't be a dictator if he did.
Prohibition was an experiment in democratic totalitarianism. Although it failed, there is no reason in principle why it could not have continued.
We are no longer a democracy and will not be again until we have eliminated fraudulent elections. We begin to eliminate fraudulent elections at the local level. Observe, expose, and demand prosecution of the guilty (including corrupt judges). Once state legislatures are put on notice that fraud will not be tolerated things will start changing for the better.
A dictator can follow the will of the people if he wants to.
What if 51% vote to euthanize all colored people?
That’s a totalitarian democracy.
In the end it depends on one’s definitions I think.
Oh really?
Ever hear of mob rule?