Replies

Well I haven’t read the article. I see it’s written by Rolling Stone.

‘nuff said.

Rolling Stone has always taken the left side of everything. I know before I read an article from them it’s all leftist sentimentality. I don’t read articles by them because of their bias.

I remember when they first came out. I knew so many would be rock star musicians, they all smoked grass, (in those days that was the total sum of getting high except for beer really) and the idea they were smarter than everyone else except those on the left was so palpable you could cut it with a knife.

The left in the sixties and seventies were so smug. THAT is where Rolling Stone hails from. I don’t know what their writers look like, oh, ahem, their ‘journalists’ but I can well imagine they are aging hippies or followers of aging hippie ideas.

I have never thought smoking grass was a brilliant idea. Your brain works well enough off drugs, drugs make it a mess after a while and the while starts when you get high. I don’t think making it all legal is a good idea, encouraging kids who need to have a good mind while going to college or learning a trade being all messed up instead, laying around listening to music and looking for a fast lay. RS considers itself brilliant for it’s stance on politics but why should we all take the word of drunk and drugged up rock musicians for our political ideas.

Of course Rolling Stone would hate Donald Trump so of course they will hate anything that exposes the left and their take down of Trump.