Geologist Robert Schoch, Boston University PhD., has determined that the Sphinx is WAY older that what Egyptologists tell us— possibly as much as 10,000 years old. Schoch is totally legit.
He may be a legitimate geologist, however, any geologist who ignores the fact that the erosion patterns on the lower sections of the Sphinx and the walls of the Sphinx enclosure are almost textbook examples of flood erosion and not gradual rainfall erosion is either incompetent or engaging in intellectual dishonesty.
Can stone be carbon dated? What evidence does Schoch use? Seriously curious, I am.
Anotehr viewpoint regarding Schoch: