Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: T Ruth

An oldie but goodie...

https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn7915-most-scientific-papers-are-probably-wrong/


12 posted on 10/01/2022 7:50:12 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ( We need to “build back better” on the bones and ashes of those forcing us to “Build Back Better.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: E. Pluribus Unum

Bkmk


13 posted on 10/01/2022 8:04:22 PM PDT by sauropod (Unbelief has nothing to say. Chance favors the prepared mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Science papers are mostly wrong because people do not understand what a science paper is. What is a scientific paper? It’s a hypothesis that is unproven, and until it is proven or proofed and is observable (observable being a key word here) i.e. if it’s not observable it will always remain a hypothesis.

The “facts” of “Settled Science” might be an applied media term given to a process the media took a SWAG at and... missed.

The key to understanding being... “if it’s not observable it will always remain a hypothesis.”


19 posted on 10/02/2022 2:27:07 AM PDT by Clutch Martin ("The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right." )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson