Last Monday Congress was out of session until September 6th, so no investigative committee can be convened for nearly a month at least. Also, there is a convention or a law (not sure which) that prohibits interference with the conduct of elections 90 days before an election occurs. August 8 was 91 days before midterms. The affidavit on which the warrant was based is “secret,” and nobody can compel Garland to reveal it, at least for quite awhile, as far as I understand. The search warrant is overly broad, but still did not appear to suggest they could search anywhere on the premises. The safe required, according to one of the legal experts, a separate warrant, but was broken into, anyway. The date of the search is the most favorable date they could get, politically. But we don’t know if its political, right?
Great insight.
I’m wondering, if they were after anything in the SCIF, the SCIF being funded by the federal government, that the federal government has a requirement that they have to know passcodes and/or combinations. Kind of like your company’s IT guy having a master password to get into your company computer, etc. and the company having filters, etc, so they can see your search histories.
Lets just say, for arguments sake, that he did have some sensitive items in there, they knew about them(as they apparently did and told him to install another lock), and something happens. They need to get in the safe and there’s some sort of protocol. I’m thinking they wouldn’t need to bring a safe-cracker. That somewhere, someone had the combo or some other means of getting into the safe.
More questions, more stonewalling, more questions, more incompetence and lies exposed, more questions.