Posted on 08/01/2022 2:35:56 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist
There's no link and I couldn't find a newsource, but this guy's sources are pretty good. If this is true I'm pretty much done with voting Republicans.
(Excerpt) Read more at twitter.com ...
Which means you’ll be voting Democrat or not voting? Sounds like cutting off your nose to spite your face.
The Congress finally doing its job after 50 years.
Evil people! All of them.
Collins and Murk aren’t Republicans.
But, but, but, you have to vote for the R
No Matter How Bad They Are
Rah Rah Romney
Hail Hail Haley
Let’s be certain to throw the baby out with the bath water.
With abortion loving GOP members who needs enemies
Legislation introduced to protect Roe v. Wade and contraception access
Rebecca Barnabi
Last updated: 05:00 PM, 1 August, 2022
roe v. wade abortion rights
(© zimmytws – stock.adobe.com)
The Reproductive Freedom For All Act would codify women’s rights to abortion and protect contraception access.
Introduced in the U.S. Senate August 1, by Sens. Tim Kaine of Virginia, Lisa Murkowski of Arkansas, Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona and Susan Collins of Maine introduced the legislation to enact federal law the essential holdings of Roe v. Wade and related cases, protecting abortion rights and contraception access. According to the press release, the bill would undo the damage of Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health, the Supreme Court decision overturning Roe v. Wade, and would enshrine in federal law the fundamental right to reproductive freedom.
“After the Supreme Court gutted a woman’s right to make personal health care decisions, Congress must restore that right,” Kaine said in the press release. “That’s why I’ve worked with my colleagues to find common ground on this bipartisan compromise that would do just that. The Reproductive Freedom For All Act would restore the right to abortion and protect access to contraception by enshrining those freedoms into federal legislation.”
The legislation would prohibit state regulations that impose an undue burden on a woman’s access to pre-viability abortions, while allowing states to enact reasonable restrictions on post-viability abortions – provided that states cannot ban abortions that are necessary to protect the life or health of the mother; protect access to contraceptives; and preserve conscience protections.
https://augustafreepress.com/legislation-introduced-to-protect-roe-v-wade-and-contraception-access/
Just as Republican as McConnell, Thune, Barrasso, Blunt, Ernst, Scott, Scott, Lee, Crapo, Grassley, Shelby, Sullivan, Boozman, Rubio, Risch, Young, Braun, Moran, Cassidy, Hyde-Smith, Daines, Fischer, Sasse, Burr, Tillis, Hoeven, Cramer, Portman, Inhofe, Lankford, Toomey, Grahamnesty, Rounds, Cornyn, Romney, Capito, Lummis.
They are all Bush League Republicans.
The object now is to replace them with true Republicans.
Why would you quit voting Republican when it’s only because the rest of the Republicans are holding firm on the filibuster that this won’t pass.
I think you should leave America. Your problem is not with Republicans, it is with American voters
Maybe I’m missing something. But didn’t the Supreme Court kick the whole abortion thing back to the states? If that’s the case, no federal law can override that ruling. It would take a constitutional amendment.
They can’t do that with reconciliation and they don’t have 60 votes to end debate on it. It goes nowhere. Collins and Murky get to pander to their ‘base’ and the status quo remains.
They need 60 to overcome a filibuster, right? Are there another 8?
Why else would she do this BEFORE a primary?
Doubling down on stupid just like Lizard Cheney.
Didn’t the Supreme Court say abortion is now a state issue? Is Congress getting involved in a matter reserved to the states?
You argue like a punk. I guess you’ve been spending too much time with the retards on Reddit and Facebook.
How can the Congress codify a “right” that has been ruled unconstitional. I don’t think Congress can codify unconstitutional “rights” without amending the Constitution or having the Supreme Court reverse their decsion.
What am I missing?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.