Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: jeffc
No, the Supreme Court of Illinois refused to do their duty.

They did not want to rule on the case, though they clearly should have. If might go back to them again, because Bruen is so clear.

The dissent (3 of 7 justices) smacked them pretty hard for being so timid.

5 posted on 07/12/2022 5:55:07 AM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: marktwain

Ahh. Got it. Thanks!


6 posted on 07/12/2022 6:07:36 AM PDT by jeffc (Let's Go Brandon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain
The dissent (3 of 7 justices) smacked them pretty hard for being so timid.

I didn't see a direct link to this. Do you have one?

IMO, every article about court rulings should contain a direct link to the actual text of same.

11 posted on 07/12/2022 10:55:21 AM PDT by zeugma (Stop deluding yourself that America is still a free country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson