Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-26 last
To: 2harddrive
If Roberts etc does not know within two weeks who the leaker is, he doesn’t want to know. There are not many people who would have access to the leaked document. Just a few dozen people.
39 posted on
05/05/2022 7:12:39 AM PDT by
PghBaldy
(12/14/12 - 930am -rampage begins... 12/15/12 - 1030am - Obama team scouts photo-op locations.)
To: 2harddrive
The vote will not/can not change.
With all the hoopla about the “unprecedented leak”, in NO WAY can the court allow a “leak” to influence/change a decision.
Talk about “precedent” setting!!!!!!!!
There would be “leaks” on every decision from now on if this leak was allowed to influence/change a decision.
40 posted on
05/05/2022 7:19:44 AM PDT by
faucetman
(Just the facts, ma'am, Just the facts )
To: 2harddrive
There was also information about one of Breyer's interns.
Specifically, there's a picture taken at a wedding of the intern with the Politico reporter who reported the leak. Tellingly, the intern has deleted that photo.
48 posted on
05/05/2022 9:34:16 AM PDT by
Tanniker Smith
(Rome didn't fall in a day, either)
To: 2harddrive
I still contend the leak came through the White House.
56 posted on
05/05/2022 10:10:34 AM PDT by
aimhigh
(THIS is His commandment . . . . 1 John 3:23)
To: 2harddrive
Can’t be, there’s another thread saying it’s likely Elizabeth Deutsch
57 posted on
05/05/2022 10:14:28 AM PDT by
Hot Tabasco
(I'm Jimmy Crack Corn and I don't care)
To: 2harddrive
Possible, but it would be a horrible disservice to Richard Jewell the wrong person, who could lose a law license and a career. Need to be absolutely certain before using names.
58 posted on
05/05/2022 10:41:19 AM PDT by
LS
("Castles made of sand, fall in the sea . . . eventually" (Hendrix) )
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-26 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson