Posted on 04/22/2022 4:07:02 AM PDT by MtnClimber
Just to be clear (and I understand loyalty and not snitching) if one of your colleagues told you they were having issues your wouldn’t say anything even though they have responsibility for many lives in those planes?
The analogy of speeding isn’t very accurate—seems more like not reporting that that person drove into work drunk as hell and probably still very intoxicated.
Curious? No. Grateful, yes. Often the best champions for victims are those who've been victimized themselves.
...and again, calling it "anti-vaxxine" is nothing but propaganda. They're not anti-vaccine and the Jim Jones Jab is not a vaccine.
Jane Long wrote: “They’re highly trained docs/scientists.....they see the dangers of these $hots, with their own eyes, and with REAL patients....and, are issuing WARNINGS, like any REAL doc, with a good conscience, would do.”
Malone has a subscription newsletter with approximately (IIRC) 160,000 paid subscribers at $60/year.
McCullough was sued by a former employer for misrepresenting his association with the employer after signing an agreement that he would not do so.
Real nice guys.
A number of drastic scenarios have been promised (“just you wait and see!!”) by opponents of the Covid shots and so far none of them have played out. Those who continue to project that the sky is going to fall soon have lost progressively more credibility in my opinion, as their dire predictions continue to fall flat instead.
I’m not vaccinated against Covid for religious/ethical reasons. As an aside, it’s quite clear that these Covid shots are not very effective at preventing Covid. Everybody I know who has been vaccinated has been okay so far, but most of them have also had Covid after being “vaccinated”.
Remember when every sickness, every death, every problem was blamed on Covid? I see a similar situation playing out now where some people attribute every death, heart attack, or weird illness to the vaccines. Ethel died of a heart attack? By golly she had a covid shot 6 months ago, that must be it! Well, maybe.
The Australian government numbers suggest that men under 30 have about a 1 in 5000 chance of developing a heart problem from the Pfizer shot specifically, some other shots have higher or lower rates. To me, that sounds about right. That adds up to a hell of a lot of people having problems, enough to explain why so much anecdotal evidence of adverse reactions, but it’s still few enough to explain why most people seem to be fine and society hasn’t ground to a halt.
T.B. Yoits wrote: “...and again, calling it “anti-vaxxine” is nothing but propaganda. They’re not anti-vaccine and the Jim Jones Jab is not a vaccine.”
Claiming the vaccines are not vaccines is just another anti-vaxxer ploy to justify not taking the vaccines. If you don’t want to take these vaccines then don’t, but quit misrepresenting them.
This is untrue. If someone is having chest pains due to any id the innumerates reasons that these rather agenda driven people stare, it would most certain to turn up on standard screening
You have inadvertently tripped on a problem that is being seen more and more with technology. What is clinically significant? We have some tests that are so exquisitely sensitive that we are not sure what they clinically mean.
And so you think microclot as you hypothesize is going to be found on the modalities you suggest? You are working backwards from a conclusion that is not demonstrated trying to prove something that if it exists is likely not clinically relevant.
And the sources as others point out is at best dubious. Someone said someone said is not great theory. But if 30% of pilots were in this condition certain the pilot who responded would be able to provide data in support of the hypothesis. He refutes it. Pilots never fly together multiple times in a row (CRM theory) so certainly our pilot friend would have seen multiple colleagues with this issue. It doesn’t exist. So either he is part of the conspiracy or the statements are not accurate. I don’t think pilots are somehow conspiring to keep data from being discovered.
The statements quoted in the OP are garbage and not supported by easily observable data.
Someone has got to start letting the lawsuits rip. The big drug companies, CDC, etc. are all liable, whether they pretend to have legal protections or not.
Wow....you seem to know what their income sources are...yet, here you are $hilling for the CDC/BigPharma, keyboard caper.
What time is your $hift over, today?
I see you’re back to your regular 8-5 $hifts, lately.
Jane Long wrote: “What time is your $hift over, today?”
I hear the Russians and Chinese are deploying a lot of bots to misrepresent the vaccines. Are you an anti-vaxxer bot?
Who is apparently not so confident of his claims that he won’t do the research and submit for peer review about the harm the vaccines are causing.
Jane Long wrote: “Wow....you seem to know what their income sources are...yet, here you are $hilling for the CDC/BigPharma, keyboard caper.”
Ask the Russians and Chinese programming bots like yourself to do some research for you. They shouldn’t have any trouble as that information is readily available on the internet.
Re: 46 - Sorry, but posting sense on this thread is a pretty lonely endeavor.
Perhaps you’ve been living under a rock, but...there are plenty of articles showing the significant dangers of these $hots.
If that’s not enough evidence for you, watch a replay of Sen Ron Johnson’s hearing where numerous medical experts testified to the dangers of these $hots. One expert is LTC Theresa Long (who was accused of being a fictitious character, by some, here) who was stifled, by her military superiors, about speaking out about these $hots. You can read more about her, here....
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/4048894/posts
And, here....
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3998967/posts
Time will continue to tell. In the meantime....why are life insurance companies adapting NEW risk models???
https://freerepublic.com/tag/lifeinsurance/index?tab=articles
Ask the Russians and Chinese programming bots like yourself to do some research for you. They shouldn’t have any trouble as that information is readily available on the internet.
Riiiight.
Because 99.5% of MY posts are about Russia and China. NOT.
This is so rich and YOU are SO busted, troll $hot $hill.
Anyone can see that AT LEAST 99.5% of YOUR posts are $hilling for BigPharma/CDC.
Take that, lying $hill.
Also, vaccines work. These shots CLEARLY don't.
Well considering we are blessed here on this forum by a conga line of daily posts from the same propagandists quoting the same sources and insisting it to be true, perhaps the better way to look at it would be — waiting for the line up of People who make arguments that you can’t refute so will use the technique of supremacy of the first statement timewise instead of a data driven argument.
To wit: the hypothesis advanced states that some person talked to a rabidly antivaxxer who has been thrown off faculty of multiple medical schools for misrepresenting his credentials that is refuted by observational data from someone in the cohort being discussed who has a sufficient N to draw a conclusion.
Yeah. I’ll take the data.
“If someone is having chest pains due to any id the innumerates reasons that these rather agenda driven people stare, it would most certain to turn up on standard screening”
It’s not that simple.
“Acute aortic dissection (AAD), acute pulmonary embolism (PE) and acute myocardial infarction (AMI) are all emergent diseases with acute chest pain. However, it is sometimes difficult to diagnose these diseases by symptoms, ECG changes and/or cardiac biomarkers, especially immediately after onset. Because these diseases are all thrombogenic diseases, we considered that D-dimer could be helpful to differentiate these diseases.”
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21478122/
That’s what the doctors sending the letter to the FAA are talking about.
Who is apparently not so confident of his claims that he won’t do the research and submit for peer review about the harm the vaccines are causing.
I’ll take REAL Dr Peter McCullough’s expertise, over yours, furry....
https://www.heartplace.com/dr-peter-a-mccullough
....Dr. McCullough has broadly published on a range of topics in medicine with 1000 publications and 600 citations in the National Library of Medicine.
His works include the “Interface between Renal Disease and Cardiovascular Illness” in Braunwald’s Heart Disease Textbook.
Dr. McCullough is a founder and current president of the Cardiorenal Society of America, an organization dedicated to bringing cardiologists and nephrologists together to work on the emerging problem of cardiorenal syndromes. His works have appeared in the New England Journal of Medicine, Journal of the American Medical Association, Lancet, British Medical Journal and other top-tier journals worldwide.
He is the editor-in-chief of Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine and senior associate editor of the American Journal of Cardiology. He serves on the editorial boards of multiple specialty journals.
Dr. McCullough has made presentations on the advancement of medicine across the world and has been an invited lecturer at the New York Academy of Sciences, the National Institutes of Health, U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and the European Medicines Agency. He has served as member or chair of data safety monitoring boards of 24 randomized clinical trials. ....
Now, buzz off, $hill troll gnat.
Read post 57.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.