Posted on 04/22/2022 4:07:02 AM PDT by MtnClimber
You are of course correct. However it seems that posting anything against Dr McCullough who was thrown off several faculties including that of Christian universities for lying does not seem to matter to those who are accusing you of blasphemy. He can do no wrong. It is amazing, it almost borders on the religious for some.
I know that many would say that I have said something unfair must perhaps you might see it differently. fair, you see? Thanks for pointing out what you have. It is absolutely true regardless is the arguments.
I believe I posted to you earlier that my opinion of the efficacy of the vaccines. A far cry from I think they can do no wrong.
It is becoming laughable.
I appreciate the think, thanks, but that’s not an answer to my question.
Must not have been me, I haven’t seen you post anything like that.
One of the ways to determining if a poster is a bot is their continuous return to the same old claims.
Safe and effective, 9-5, 99.5% of the time….eh, $hot $hill bot?
🙄
Go away, pest! You been bu$ted, “bot”.
Perhaps when you are done working for big Pharma today and Duke is finished with this CDC shilling, I can leave my fake Practice and we can all meet at the deep state pub and pick up our unmarked cash from darth Vader and have a good weekend hoping to reduce the population by a conspiracy that every physician and now pilot must be in on. The Deep state probably sends the information to the pilots by the computer on the flight deck so no one else can read it.
In case it goes without saying for the bots out there /s
🙏
That was a stupid reply.
If he wanted to an anti-vax article where does he say he ONLY thinks we should post antivax.
you argue like a liberal or millennial
don’t know which is worse sometimes...
Him: “I want to post this article from this site”
you: “OH you must ONLY want to post things from there!!”
him (and any one with a brain)” “He didn’t say, that duhhhhh”
I can vouch for this information. I won’t say where but many pilots I work with have talked about adverse reactions they’ve had to the jabs, but they won’t say anything because they will lose their civilian job as well as their military job.
dynoman wrote: “Check posts 60 and 62 and tell me how they show the vaccines worked.”
What is your definition of ‘worked’?
Here’s mine:
How COVID vaccines shaped 2021 in eight powerful charts
The extraordinary vaccination of more than four billion people, and the lack of access for many others, were major forces this year — while Omicron’s arrival complicated things further.
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-03686-x
Mr. K wrote: “That was a stupid reply. If he wanted to an anti-vax article where does he say he ONLY thinks we should post antivax.”
He attacks all articles that support the vaccines. Do you see him challenging any of the anti-vaccine articles?
DugwayDuke wrote: “One of the ways to determining if a poster is a bot is their continuous return to the same old claims.”
and Jane Long replies with her usual : “$hot $hill” attack.
DugwayDuke wrote: “One of the ways to determining if a poster is a bot is their continuous return to the same old claims.”
and Jane Long replies with her usual : “$hot $hill” attack.
Jane Long busts herself.
Sure, “bot”...to use YOUR word/attack....
https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/4057004/posts?page=91#91
Stuff it, bu$ted, AGAIN, 9-5/99.5 troll.
You make this too easy......now, buzz along, annoying lil gnat.
Sorry, but I'll still be on call.
Never know when another VAERS analysis will drop.
“...beyond any shadow of a doubt...”
Please stop. That’s a similar sort of statement that people who are absolutely certain about anthropogenic climate change make. Things like “the science is settled”. Science is rarely settled as new research is conducted. “Beyond any shadow of a doubt falls into that category”.
I was referring to McCullough and research or a review of research he has submitted. He was a co-author (or lead) on COVID-19 treatment I believe. He’s being lazy by not compiling something akin in the history discipline to an annotated bibliography - that outlines in writing research that backs up his claims.
Re: 109 - An MD and another researcher looked at every study at ivmmeta.com and presented their findings on mid-November 2021.
Their discussion is here:
https://astralcodexten.substack.com/p/ivermectin-much-more-than-you-wanted?s=r
Their summery:
Ivermectin doesn’t reduce mortality in COVID a significant amount (let’s say d > 0.3) in the absence of comorbid parasites: 85-90% confidence
Parasitic worms are a significant confounder in some ivermectin studies, such that they made them get a positive result even when honest and methodologically sound: 50% confidence
Fraud and data processing errors are of similar magnitude to p-hacking and methodological problems in explaining bad studies (95% confidence interval for fraud: between >1% and 5% as important as methodological problems; 95% confidence interval for data processing errors: between 5% and 100% as important)
Probably “Trust Science” is not the right way to reach proponents of pseudoscientific medicine: ???% confidence
Hmm.
Got my secret note delivered earlier today, followed the map and dug up a container of ChiCom cash. KFC tonight for sure!
Pretty much verified what I said. They massively crapped the bed.
ane Long wrote: “You make this too easy......now, buzz along, annoying lil gnat.”
You should ask your Russian/Chinese programmers for a reboot.
You mentioned that you told people to take vitamin D and zinc. There are a lot of ads promoting vaccines. There are very few, if any, promoting vitamin D and zinc. Two of my doctors suggested vaccines, none suggested vitamin D and zinc.
What do you think of that?
How safe and effective are the vaccines? How safe and effective are vitamin D and zinc?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.