Where Are the Vaccine Death Signals in Excess Mortality Data?

The Daily Skeptic ^ | April 6, 2022 | Will Jones

[fireman15]

I wrote recently that, with over 2,000 deaths reported to the Yellow Card reporting system as adverse events following Covid vaccination, the true figure of U.K. deaths from short-term vaccine injury may be around 20,000. This is allowing for an under-reporting factor of 10, which, I argued, doesn’t seem unreasonable given analysis of an Israeli survey of booster recipients, which found under-reporting factors of hundreds or thousands for many adverse effects when compared to U.S. VAERS reports. The under-reporting factor for hospitalisation was 120, meaning 120 times more people reported being hospitalised as a result of their booster in the survey than in VAERS...

What I think can be said with confidence based on the charts below is that the mortality data are compatible with the assumption that the true number of vaccine deaths is around ten times the number reported to the adverse event reporting systems. While the data in some countries may show clearer signals, they don’t in all countries, but nonetheless are compatible with the worrying signs seen in the adverse event reporting systems and elsewhere.

What we really need are autopsies carried out with the potential for Covid vaccine injury in mind and proper investigations of the safety signals from the adverse event reporting systems. Any signals that do appear in overall mortality – such as the unexplained rise in non-Covid deaths since summer 2021 – should also be taken seriously, given how severe they have to be in order to show up amid normal mortality and confounding factors.

[fireman15]

This is an interesting article filled with charts from numerous that illustrate the author's assumption that the true number of deaths and injury from the experimental "vaccines" actually is ten times what is reported through the VAERS system. This has been the commonly accepted participation rate for other vaccines since the VAERS system became widely used in the 1990s.

Of course, VAERS has shown far more injury and death associated with the experimental covid "vaccines" than all others combined in the last 30 years. This has led to skepticism that the CDC and the FDA would continue to push them after the data indicated that they had so many problems... However, we have learned a great deal from this situation about the dependableness of government bureaucrats when it comes to protecting the public.

[Cold Heart]

The Harvard study said pretty much the same thing.

Meanwhile in Portland they are still pushing the jab on toddlers.

40 times more a chance of death from the jab than from the Wuhan Covid in kids.

Portland, ignorant and evil at the same time.

[RideForever]

The reasons there are no autopsies is that the CDC ‘recommends’ a level 4 lab for CoVID cases (pressurized suits); whereas if no autopsy requested, an embalmer opens the victim’s body instead. Without a level 4 lab.

[fireman15]

The reasons there are no autopsies is that the CDC ‘recommends’ a level 4 lab for CoVID cases (pressurized suits);

We are not talking about autopsies for Covid cases here... we are talking about people who have died after being vaccinated for reasons other than Covid. The reason there are no vaccinations of this group is because no government agency or pharmaceutical company is willing to fund something that will demonstrate gross negligence on their part.

[ChildOfThe60s]

I think we passed gross negligence quite a ways back. I think what would be found now would be gross maliciousness.

[GBA]

Sooner or later, those who have the power to halt or skew this information or somehow keep the public from learning about it will either be out of power or will simply be outvoted by the public’s growing concerns and curiosities about what was done unto us and what will happen to us next.

Then, there’s gonna be some ‘splainin’ to do, Lucy … and good luck with that.