Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Red Badger

I wonder if it would be easier to “resurrect” a marsupial than a mammal, since the “surrogate mother” won’t have to carry them fully to term?

Also, which species would they pick for a surrogate? With mammoths, elephants are the obvious choice. For a Tasmanian tiger, would they use a Tasmanian devil, or a wombat, or what?


7 posted on 03/03/2022 10:15:47 AM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Boogieman

Roo...................


9 posted on 03/03/2022 10:16:35 AM PST by Red Badger (Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegal aliens are put up in hotels.....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Boogieman

Does it even have a near-species relative still around in Australia? From the standpoint of taxonomy what’s close? The Taz & Wombat looks-wise seem a stretch.


11 posted on 03/03/2022 10:19:33 AM PST by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Boogieman
Marsupials are mammals. They're just non-placental ones.
Class: Mammalia
Infraclass: Marsupialia
Order: Dasyuromorphia
Family: Thylacinidae
Genus: Thylacinus
Species: T. cynocephalus

It'll be cool if they can accomplish resurrecting the species. To do it, I'd guess they'll try with the closest genetic match.

18 posted on 03/03/2022 10:47:19 AM PST by Varda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Boogieman
You're gonna use me for what?


22 posted on 03/03/2022 11:14:17 AM PST by xp38
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson