Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Stingray51
To be more precise, the settlement was (from what I read) for the total limits of Remington’s insurance. I am guessing that once the plaintiffs indicated they would accept that amount, Remington took the position that its insurers should give up their total limits or it would be “bad faith”,

Remington had nothing to do with this "settlement". It no longer exists as an organization. It was split up into components and sold off in bankruptcy.

25 posted on 02/20/2022 2:29:20 PM PST by marktwain (Amazing people can read a persons entire personality and character from one photograph.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: marktwain

Ok so does the bad faith excess of limits concept still apply?

Anyway, your point is a good one about the b.s. spin on this being a precedent


32 posted on 02/20/2022 4:02:09 PM PST by Stingray51 ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson