Experimental Status of LENR

ARPA-E Workshop on Low-Energy Nuclear Reactions, George Washington University ^ | October 2021 | David J. Nagel

[Candor7]

Oh , you mean this One here below?

Thank you for this set of links , great stuff. I see that they actually pulled off a fusion instant with the Joint European Torus (JET) near Oxford, UK recently.

https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/4036835/posts

*****************************************

Re: Experimental Status of LENR
From Kevmo | 02/16/2022 2:50:10 PM PST read

The Cold Fusion/LENR Ping List

http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/coldfusion/index?tab=articles

Keywords: ColdFusion; LENR; lanr; CMNS
chat—science

—

http://lenr-canr.org/

Vortex-L
http://tinyurl.com/pxtqx3y

Acronyms:
LENR: Low Energy Nuclear Reactions. [Also Lattice Enabled Nuclear Reactions, but seldom used]
CANR: Chemical Assisted Nuclear Reactions [fallen into disuse along with LANR/Lattice Assisted Nuclear Reactions]
CMNS: Condensed Matter Nuclear Science
LCF: Lattice Confined Fusion [NASA’s term for it]
AHE: Anomolous Heating Effect. Also PFAHE, for the Pons-Fleischmann AHE.

Best book to get started on this subject:
EXCESS HEAT
Why Cold Fusion Research Prevailed by Charles Beaudette

https://www.abebooks.com/9780967854809/Excess-Heat-Why-Cold-Fusion-0967854806/plp

Updated No Internal Trolling Rules for FR per Jim Robinson

https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3928396/posts

If someone says stop, then stop. Do not enter onto a thread on a topic you don’t like just to disrupt, rattle cages, poke sticks, insult the regulars, or engage in trolling activities, etc. ~Jim Robinson

The issue isn’t whether we allow skepticism, it is whether we allow hyperskeptics and skeptopaths to ruin the scientific dialog. Such FReepers who persist in polluting these threads have been asked to leave, and we are asking that they open their own threads if they have comments.

https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3977426/posts?page=19#19

Comment #13 Removed by Moderator

Comment #14 Removed by Moderator

Comment #16 Removed by Moderator

Comment #17 Removed by Moderator

Comment #18 Removed by Moderator

This topic has a following, people who wish to learn and discuss the materials presented.

Please refrain from posting anything that doesn’t legitimately address the issue.

Something is going on in this segment of science. There are a considerable number of research groups studying the matter.

19 posted on 7/19/2021, 6:45:09 PM by Sidebar Moderator

************************************

[Bikkuri]

"Converting from a PDF/Powerpoint file to something that can be posted on FR is quite challenging. The format gets messed up in the wildest ways. If anyone has suggestions better than using https://convertio.co/ I'm all ears..."

Me personally, I would copy/paste to Notepad++ and hand input (type it in) in HTML.
Not the most efficient way (and time consuming), but I can see what's there and correct as needed.

[Kevmo]

and hand input (type it in) in HTML.
***No thanks. Been there, done that.

You used to be able to just “view source” and then post the HTML source but I think those days are gone. Especially going from PDF or Powerpoint to HTML.

[Bikkuri]

(NOT PDF) In HTML, while on the website, right click, and you should be able to choose th view source. Some website have a block on that, somehow.. but if you hit F12, an editor will pop up with HTML and CSS. It is tricky, and takes getting used to.

Not sure if that would help you..

[Kevmo]

I went to the original file
https://arpa-e.energy.gov/sites/default/files/2021LENR_workshop_Nagel.pdf

converted it to HTML

and tried to “view source” but it is a very complicated panel that comes up. I can’t even view source. But I can view the file...

[Silentgypsy]

Now I’m glad I saved your page and two of the articles. Perhaps a copyright issue?

My husband used to try to follow posting guidelines to the letter, and there were times when his posts were pulled in what appeared to be an arbitrary manner and without explanation. Mystifying.