Posted on 02/11/2022 6:57:44 AM PST by Caipirabob
Here, we report the case of a man living with HIV who, having previously achieved stable viral suppression, experienced a transient period of non-suppressible viremia after receiving a dose of COVID-19 vaccine.
The patient, a 65-year-old heterosexual male, was diagnosed with HIV infection in March 2020, during a diagnostic workup for chronic liver disease due to former alcohol abuse.
In April 2021, the patient, by then suppressed for more than 6 months, with a negative clinical history and negative anti-N antibodies for SARS-CoV-2, received the first dose of mRNA-1273 vaccine (Moderna Biotech) in the context of the Italian vaccination campaign.
…When observed, most VL increases occurred 7–14 days after vaccination. A recent randomized controlled trial compared the effects of several vaccination schedules versus placebo in suppressed PLWH and did not find effects on plasma RNA, but showed an increase in HIV cell-associated RNA,CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell activation
Previous studies have found transient increases in HIV VL after vaccination for influenza, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and hepatitis B virus among others, whereas others have shown no effect. A recent randomized controlled trial compared the effects of several vaccination schedules versus placebo in suppressed PLWH and did not find effects on plasma RNA, but showed an increase in HIV cell-associated RNA, CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell activation markers, as well as HIV-specific CD8+ responses.
The most likely mechanism explaining the increased HIV transcription observed in the context of standard vaccines administered to ART-suppressed PLWH is a generalized inflammatory response with cytokine production, able to activate bystander cells harboring latent HIV, rather than activation of infected vaccine-specific T-cells.
… It appears that this is the first report of a plasma HIV RNA increase after vaccination with an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in a patient with documented adherence, possibly reflecting induced proviral transcription.
(Excerpt) Read more at ncbi.nlm.nih.gov ...
This is the only credible documented study I have found that shows a direct connection between an MRNA vaccine and activation of latent HIV. If anyone finds more, PLEASE POST THEM IN THIS THREAD. I will definitely read and share them.
When you see future reports of this, examine the documented case study and look for the mechanism of induced activation and see if it makes sense. A meme does not qualify as a peer reviewed research document.
There has been unjustifiable hysterics stating the shots GIVE people HIV. The only documented case I can locate is associated to an already infected individual.
Please do the necessary research before you believe any commentary associated to this topic and protect conservative credibility.
Here is a link to one of the best repository for research I’ve found.
https://search.nih.gov/search?affiliate=nih&query=mRNA+hiv
Sometimes it is helpful to unmask latent infection to be able to attack it.
Hidden virus, by definition, is not being wiped out by antivirals.
Well said
*
Very good point. I hope they are seriously digging into this, although it’s the only report I could find on the matter.
Thank you sir. I’ve been disturbed by the back and forth these past few months. Going forward I really want to dig into a research my commentary and truly vet this type of material. It enforces intellectual honesty that I see as an extension of conservatism. Particularly as it has been entirely abandoned by the left.
I think your caution is warranted.
So little is yet known about the long-term affects of mRNA technology, and specifically the EUA-protected injections being distributed.
Inflammatory responses and other latent issues "reactivated" after the latest "vaccinations" is an issue. The only question is -- how much of an issue? Avoiding the question is not an answer.
“There has been unjustifiable hysterics stating the shots GIVE people HIV. The only documented case I can locate is associated to an already infected individual.”
ADE & HIV are not remotely associated and, as you cite, hysterics govern some debate on adverse events.
Anyone confused by the differences between HIV, ADE & immunological disorder currently unspecified by observed in MANY of the jabbed (see postings here at FR re DMED data) need only READ prolific information posted by judicious FReepers and cease merely browsing headlines & excerpts.
It is my opinion that the HIV ‘conspiracy’ as it pertains to the ‘vaccines’ is merely conflation generated by state/corporate actors & their adherents in support of the ‘vaccine’ regime in an ongoing scheme (conspiracy) to discredit those of us classified as “informed.”
The study is a great find.
I can see how it might get misused. Some folks through out anything to enhance their point. You are correct it is intellectually dishonest
[[-— “An inflammatory response associated to cytokine production seemly reactivated latent HIV rather than vaccine infected T-cells.”]]
I don’t know if I’m understanding this right, but it seems that the vax caused relapse of his? If so, what aboutmpeople,about people, other conditions that are in remission who get vaxxed? Are they relapsing too?
That’s what i was wondering. Not justmviral,just viral,, but Wil. It affect conditions that aren’t viral in nature too that are in supression/remission?
I have a friend who wonders if his wife’s autoimmune disease is flaring up from the vaccine.
Literally a lab rat
I’ve wondered that too. No way to tell I suppose, as the diseases can flare on their own too.
Get the jab...wind up on a slab.
I read this earlier and couldn’t think of a reply that made sense then, but here (I think) it is:
From some of the rhetoric surrounding the various vaccines, and because some of those discussing the vaccines are not medical professionals or even that well-read on medicine, it does sound sometimes like they are saying that the SARS-CoV2 vaccine in some of its forms (it’s like the vaccine is a virus now, right? like it has a life of its own!) MIGHT GIVE YOU HIV/AIDS.
That’s what happens when you force non-professionals into an arena where the pros are having an ideological fight. They’re cannon fodder.
My impression is that they use previous concoctions that have to do with HIV/AIDS as a base for further concoctions, because there’s something that’s desirable in the previous concoctions as far as prevention/treatment for what’s going on now.
Scientists are gonna science, whether results spell the end of the human race or not. However, that doesn’t de-indemnify them. They’re not just little kids playing in a sandbox. (For sandbox, read universe or earth.)
Dr Dog Torturer wasn’t thinking about benefits to humanity when he devised this particular concoction. He wanted to infect a lot of people, fast, with something that nobody in the West was that familiar with. (I know, you thought all those pics/vids of Chinese in Hazmat suits summarily executing musk/fur/farm animals in the thousands was “disease prevention”! Or maybe because Ch1nee are gleeful sadists, either-or. Note: The Chinese citizens know that they could magically transform into musk/fur/weird medicine animals pretty much at any time, anywhere.)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.