Anyone who said this in 2020 was anti-science.
I was among those accused of being "anti-science" for having regularly compared "official" Covid deaths to "official" populations by nation and state.
( "Official" Covid deaths by area/region / area/region ) x 100 = "Official" percentage of "official" deaths by population expressed as a percentage of said population.
This alone showed huge anomalies in the "official" stats, from data collection through to analysis and policy.
The Corman-Drosten PCR test, now quasi-abandoned by the CDC and FDA, was coded in January of 2000 in Berlin, based on genetic sequences provided by the Communist Chinese. In March the "official" pandemic was pronounced by the WHO. In April the WHO published a "how to" manual for making Covid the "official" diagnosis in multiple co-morbidities deaths. Since then various governments around the world have slowly been walking back their "official" death stats, from Italy to some US states.
Walensky's "75%" echoes Birx' remark about "6%" and not trusting what the CDC publishes. As many here have noted, there is a bloody differences between "from" and "with." In fact, it is a huge anomaly, as gun shot deaths and traffic accidents deaths became "Covid deaths" courtesy of government policies.
It has turned out that the WHO, the CDC and NIH have been "anti-science" as they and European counterparts are walking back and dialing done the hysteria.
"75%" of a big number in reality when one considers "error percentages."
“Anyone who said this in 2020 was anti-science.”
Nope, the cdc/ hospitals and researchers were saying in early 2020 covid was attacking people with comorbidities the most and pretty much everyone agreed.
From Feb 27, 2020.
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.02.25.20027664v1