PCR Tests Have Served Their Purpose in the Covid “Crisis”, They’re Now Being Cancelled – Everywhere

dailyexpose.uk ^ | 1/7/2022 | RHODA WILSON

[ransomnote]

On 7 July 2021 the CDC updated their “Instructions for Use” of RT-PCR Covid tests.   This was the exact date the CDC notified clinical laboratories and testing sites performing Covid testing of the withdrawal of Emergency Use Authorisation (“EUA”) from 31 December 2021 and to begin a transition to another FDA-authorised Covid test.

Page 40 of the Instructions for Use of the PCR test states (emphasis our own):

“Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV were available for CDC use at the time the test was developed and this study conducted, assays designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full-length RNA (N gene; GenBank accession: MN908947.2) of known titer (RNA copies/µL) spiked into a diluent consisting of a suspension of human A549 cells and viral transport medium (VTM) to mimic clinical specimen.”

ransomnote: video available on Expose website

After almost two years of incorrect and fraudulent use of the PCR test, there seems to be a worldwide Government campaign to stop its use. Here are some examples:

“Canadians seeking a COVID-19 PCR test in recent days may have faced long line-ups at testing centres and a shortage of appointment slots as demand has risen amid the spread of the Omicron variant.” – CTV News, 26 December 2021

“Changes made to PCR testing guidance amid record demand [in Northern Ireland].  The Public Health Agency said it had issued new protocols to help ensure ‘the continued and targeted delivery of the service’.” – Belfast Telegraph, 29 December 2021

“A widespread shortage of PCR tests across the devolved nations was due to an administrative error, the First Minister of Scotland has said.” – Belfast Telegraph, 29 December 2021

“Asymptomatic people who test positive in Wales no longer required to have PCR test.” – ITV, 5 January 2021

“From today, people in NI who get a positive lateral flow test should presume that they have Covid-19 and that they are infectious – a PCR test will no longer be required to confirm the result.” – 4NI, 5 January 2022

“Boris scraps extra Covid testing rules in drive to stop Omicron shutting down the economy … And people testing positive after a lateral flow test do not have to have a PCR confirmation.” – Daily Express, 6 January 2022

“The need for PCR tests has now changed [in Scotland] in a bid to relieve pressure in test centres and labs.” – Daily Record, 6 January 2022

“Australians are no longer required to get a PCR test to confirm their COVID-positive result.” – ABC Net, 6 January 2021

A 20-year trail of patent applications concerning the virus responsible for Covid-19 proves it is neither new nor the result of a jump from animals to humans.  In July 2021, a dossier of evidence supporting these claims was presented by Dr. David Martin to the international Corona Investigative Committee. The first SARS outbreak in the latter part of 2001 “gave rise to a ‘very problematic’ April 2003 patent filing by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). It was for the entire SARS gene sequence, and for a series of derivative patents covering means of detection, including the PCR test [widely used today purportedly to diagnose cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection],” The Conservative Woman wrote. 

“People should remember that all the “covid” case data is based on PCR and antigen tests which are meaningless. They give positive results for those with normal flu, which has the exact same symptomology as what they are calling Covid19. This conflation is clear as day and must be pointed out to everyone and we need to take the governments of the world to court for conducting no risk benefit analysis and perpetuating a fraud on the public and restricting basic human rights at par with the Nazi and Soviet era.,” Robin Monotti posted on Telegram on 31 December 2021.

ransomnote: video available on Expose website

Dr. Mike Yeadon: Covid-19 Lies – The PCR Test, The Highwire, 14 June 2021 (10 mins)

Further resources:

• CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel
• 07/21/2021: Lab Alert: Changes to CDC RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 Testing
• The CDC Withdraw the Emergency Use of ​The PCR Test ​In 10 Days’ Time​, Why Is It Still Being Used in the UK?
• Video: Pfizer VP “The Thing to Be Terrified of Is Your Government”, The Highwire 14 June 2021
• Video: Documentary on The PCR Test Deception, Health Impact News, 8 December 2021

[ransomnote]

ransomnote: In July I recall reading that Bill Gates and George Soros have been developing a testing company to take over testing when the PCR is withdrawn. I haven't heard anything since then - but I imagine they are still out there.

Image from the first video:

[ransomnote]

PING

[Blurb2350]

The CDC website appear’s to be overrun by highly infectious apostrophe’s.

[wetgundog]

Inaccurate, Ineffective, Bullshit Test that cannot distinguish between the China Virus and Influenza. Many false positives. Might as well as guess.

[E. Pluribus Unum]

False-positives R Us.

[oil_dude]

Because they cannot distinguish between COVID and the Flu...

[seowulf]

A widespread shortage of PCR tests across the devolved nations was due to an administrative error

Well, our nation has certainly devolved over the last two years. Civilization should be completely ruined in no time.

[packagingguy]

“Why did the PCR test lose it’s (sic, not “it’s” for “it is” but “its” instead) EMU” (where is the question mark?)

Any kid in 6th grade English class could have corrected that. Sloppy writing from the “authorities”. Good catch.

[Grampa Dave]

Dr. Mike Yeadon: Covid-19 Lies – The PCR Test, The Highwire, 14 June 2021

[cymbeline]

“The CDC website appear’s to be overrun by highly infectious apostrophe’s.”

And how about this paragraph that is opaque to me:

“Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV were available for CDC use at the time the test was developed and this study conducted, assays designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full-length RNA (N gene; GenBank accession: MN908947.2) of known titer (RNA copies/µL) spiked into a diluent consisting of a suspension of human A549 cells and viral transport medium (VTM) to mimic clinical specimen.”

[exinnj]

They created a model and, without confirming the validity of the model to imitate live virus, developed tests to confirm the presence of the model. Then they extrapolated/assumed the test will produce same results with actual virus. The scientific malfeasance of such project is mind boggling. And all this is happening in the most technologically advanced country in the world, supposedly…

[mass55th]

I began questioning the accuracy of the tests back in 2020. In April 2020, Broadway actor Nick Cordero had his leg amputated. The papers reported it was due to Covid complications. His wife said he had been tested three times for Covid. The first two times he tested negative. The third time he tested positive...and he was in a hospital for months before he died in July of 2020. A friend’s son worked with a man who was experiencing Covid-like symptoms. Both men were tested three times over a period of two to three weeks. Both tested negative on the first two tests, then both tested positive on the third test. They aren’t the only examples. There were plenty back then, and there are plenty of examples even today. One of my first reactions to the shots coming out, was that I wouldn’t take them, because there wasn’t even an accurate test for Covid. Since then, a whole lot of other info has come to light, ie., side effects, possible death, as well as the ineffectiveness of the shots, which have shown that my initial reaction to not ever getting the shots, has proven to be the right decision.

[Freee-dame]

Evidence of malfeasance is the fact that people were not told how many amplification cycles were used on their PCR test before it showed a positive nor have any statistics been released about this. I wonder if data was even gathered.

[Deaf Smith]

The World Health Organization (WHO) denounced the PCR test the afternoon of 01-20-2021...Bad Orange Man gone.

[Deaf Smith]

Last Sunday at church, I spoke with several Dr members, none knew that the CDC denounced the PCR test.

One couple is part of Doctors Without Borders.

[SERKIT]

So.....if people had flu-like symptoms, were tested for C19, got a positive (faulty) result, did the practitioners stop there and not test for Influenza A or B, thus explaining why we had virtually NO flu cases during the pandemic?

[ransomnote]

BINGO!
Then they let the flu run untreated in the fragile elderly and when a secondary pneumonia settled in, didn’t catch it. No medications for a Covid patient. Not even standard attempts at antivirals. Nothing.

Voila - if you don’t treat the fragile elderly, if you insist the disease have a long time to settle in deep into the lungs until you provide ventilators, which are not treatments, you have a Plandemic.