Additionally, the microscope used is not high end equipment. Optical resolution is not that great and the microscope apparently is not equipped with the best type of lens for the sample matrix. The video shows phase contrast lenses versus nomarski interference contrast lenses that probably would be the ideal match.
I could rattle on further about technical concerns of which I have a number but will cut it short here. My qualifications are dual degrees in microbiology and chemical engineering and worked professionally in both. Retired now. With regards to microscopy, I drove for 10 years a research grade Zeiss Photomicroscope, a $40,000 microscope setup.
What would it take for me to get a better comfort level? It would be work out of a high end research lab probably out of a university or industry. I see bits and pieces of concerning information by capable individuals but it is disjointed.
I wish we had persons of your skepticism parsing everything the CDC/Walensky and Fauci say. THey just say, “We’re seeing evidence....” and it’s never questioned. They told pregnant women to get the vax - no one asked to look at records.
Pharmas are supposed to release raw data but Pfizer didn’t and no one has asked for it, until now. We’re being told we can see Pfizer’s raw data in 75 years. Crickets.
The PCR test does not work, is not the appropriate tool, and has a 95%+ false positive rate. And people with your training - well, I just didn’t hear them say ANYTHING at all. Then the CDC tacitly admitted it can’t discern among coronaviruses and people of your skill said...nothing. I didn’t see anyone aside from me pointing out that the PCR is invalid and was used to ‘validate’ the ‘vaccines’.
The CDC created millions of contaminated masks at the peak of what they turned into a crisis - fanning panic and then producing on an urgent basis millions of masks that had to be destroyed because they were contaminated. When investigated, it turned out they lacked professionalism, didn’t follow their own protocols, had open containers of coronavirus in the same room they were producing the masks.
And still, no one with expertise got in there and said anything. And many/most still insist we must do as Fauci says because he’s right about Covid/Delta/Omnicron. All that Wuhan treason is NOTHING - we just have to blindly follow his edicts as they flip flop from day to day.
But as soon as an independent researcher says something negative about the ‘vaccines’, well then “IT’S ON!”. Precision bursts into being and now, nothing shall meet the requirements. Not people, not process, not equipment, not conclusion. Nothing at all.
Why do Faucists receive a “Get out of Nuremberg Trials” FREE card?
What you posted is real science. Information should be freely shared and discussed. Perhaps the vaccine sample was contaminated during testing. Perhaps the test equipment itself is at fault. Or, maybe, there really are strange contaminates (or even intentional creations) in the vaccine. Unless other scientists/doctors are allowed to examine the results, perform similar tests, and report findings, we won’t know.
“I’m a bit uneasy about the quality of the information developed by Zalewksi and his qualifications to draw the conclusions that he does. Per the article, he has degrees in biology and geology and I’m not sure which field or both that he has a doctorate in.”
“My qualifications are dual degrees in microbiology and chemical engineering and worked professionally in both. “
🤔