Citing “experts” from a Business Insider article is the opposition to a Research Gate article. You choose. Others choose. But it is not definitive. She says so herself.
BI’s Hilary Brueck reports with words like “through heart-wrenching personal experience,” and the article includes “It is still possible that, in combination with other drugs, the antiparasitic could be one item used in a multilayered system of treatment for COVID-19, perhaps to speed recovery in the early stages of disease. But other early treatment options, like Merck's new pill, appear far more promising in human trials.”
So she argues for the “promising and as yet unavailable Merck product, which is a forecast for the future from Business Insider.
The article ends, “...come to your own conclusions.”
Here are some data points for Brazil and that “frenzy”:
( 616,457 deaths / 212,559,417 population ) x 100 = 0.29% of the total population as of 13 December 2021.
https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/region/brazil
One third of one percent dead “officially” over about two years.
Here are some other “heart wrenching” tales which BI and Ms. Brueck will likely not be covering.
“come to your own conclusions” that will not be allowed by the follow the science cult, even on FR. You will follow their conclusions based on their warped version of “science.”
Only the jab can save us along with Remdisivir and the vent, those are your “science” approved choices, anything else is heresy and shall not be tolerated, their conclusion is your conclusion and you will be made to care and accept it...