It could be devastating to the defense, if the judge allows evidence involving his admitted viewing of pornography.
Legally there is a distinction between adult pornography and child pornography. The jury could conclude if he’s into adult pornography, that it’s likely he got into child pornography as well.
From what I understand, they have the evidence of child pornography on his system, but his defense involves denying he
downloaded it from the internet.
Seems doubtful these minor females were strangers...how did he know them and were they relatives?