Posted on 10/28/2021 1:45:44 PM PDT by ransomnote
you can unbuckle a seatbelt...
you can’t unbuckle the experimental shots...
>>However, actual science says vaccines don’t work for viruses based on the common cold. Never have. Never will.
I am willing to believe that is possible; I am not willing to believe that the people dying from covid wouldn’t have died it they didn’t get vaccinated, which is the basis of almost all the click-bait articles from the theexpose.uk.
I am very concerned about young people, who have almost zero risk of dying from covid dropping dead after getting vaccinated because they were forced to - that is the real story that needs to be investigated (any why I am against mandates and especially for young people), and why I try to keep the crazies in check with their outlandish claims - once someone decides you (or your cause) are crazy, it doesn’t matter what you say or what evidence you provide - its all dismissed.
I would much prefer a fact-based discussion - not one pushed by a click-bait leftist rag like this OP’s link.
So why ain't you out scooping up their trucks and guns and dope?
If everyone and their Mexican in-laws was croaking all over the place
then there ought to be tons of trucks and guns and dope sitting
around with nobody watching over them.
Man, you people don't know what to do when a good apocalypse lands in your lap.
| qwerty1234 wrote: |
click bait website...avoid at all costs. Supposedly a ‘conservative’ website - every time you visit they share your information with facebook, google, stripe and paypal - 4 extreme left wing corporations - do yourself a favor, and avoid at all costs. |
You're so desperate to censor content on FR that you lie and claim that website shares information with facebook, google, stripe and paypal? They are soley supported by donations and are conservatives. Is there anything about conservatives and free speech you don't hate?
You post British data while extrapolating that such numbers apply to the USA as a whole. They don’t even match what is happening in Central Virginia for example.
Of course the USA numbers are all over the place depending on the states as well as the political spin in DC.
On the ground from where I work...No Covid sick in our ICU for two days while there were about 20 in the whole hospital. Total covid Numbers going down....85/15 Unvaxxed/vaxxed but vaxxed numbers going up as the vaxxes lose more potency in more people...about what I expected. More vaxxed people I talk to having doubts about boosters and will not take them. (I am familiar with a case of covid contracted a month after pfizer vax but never came to hospital.) No vax mandates yet, I suspect our company is going to “finesse” how they respond to FED issued OSHA mandates and Va has its own OSHA anyway. I think they will offer “weekly” testing and relaxed rules about medical and religious exemptions. They don’t want to lose good Trauma Nurses of child bearing age who want to have babies eventually.
There are the worlds of the BIG NUMBERS and then there are the small slices of the world of numbers that don’t fit all the “Big Numbers’s” parameters.
You keep using Great Britain’s numbers and their conditions are different from the USA....some things may match in terms of percentages and some don’t. The EXPOSE’ site has more than once put out questionable articles from “concerned readers” ...for example one article purporting gloom and doom of the human immune system as millions will die from an AIDS like syndrome by Christmas... by wildly misconstruing even the UK’s own data showing data that only tracks Covid vax immunity decline ...not declines in total immune functions in humans so vaxxed. That is completely irresponsible fear mongering from such a site!
Quote: “Yes, and when 100% of people are vaccinated, 100% of covid deaths will be vaccinated - did you miss math class?”
And when (God forbid) you reach that goal, what percentage of adverse deaths will be the acceptable end goal? 25%, 50%, or a world wide population maintained at 500 million as the Georgia guidestones call for? At what point will the eugenecists be happy?
You should embrace this side of your personality more, than the one that shows itself most often. Then you might actually recognize the value of sites like theexpose, considering all the government/media/authoritarians they are attempting to counter, even if they might fudge on a detail here or there. To claim the CDC or FDA is squeaky clean in that regard would be absurd.
>>You’re so desperate to censor content on FR that you lie and claim that website shares information with facebook, google, stripe and paypal? They are soley supported by donations and are conservatives. Is there anything about conservatives and free speech you don’t hate?
So why, each time you visit the website is your information sent to facebook and google? That is an *absolute fact* that anyone that knows how the internet works can easily see it - a supposedly ‘conservative’ website that sends your data to to those big leftist ‘evil’ corporations they are in bed with.
Freerepublic doesn’t do that, and it easy to see and find out if you know where to look.
Try again.
Try again.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Lie again, gwerty1234.
>>Lie again, gwerty1234.
I get it, you can’t prove it - I can - so you came up with a rhyme. How clever.
Ask someone smarter than you, that knows tech, if I am right or not and then get back to me.
I’ll wait for your apology.
Quote:
Thats especially important if you run a click-bait website like ‘theexpose.uk’ who shares your data with facebook and google each time you visit....does that sound like a conservative website to you? or a website that is selling your data to big leftists corporations?
Have you downloaded the linked pdf’s and studied the statistical source data? Or have you drawn your conclusions the same way the left does? If it disagrees with mainstream media and the left, it must be demonized as disinformation sent by the Chinese or the Russians. Either way, it must be comforting to know that not only those who fund gain of function research have your back, but also the “ladies” on the view also draw the same conclusions.
I would much prefer a fact-based discussion - not one pushed by a click-bait leftist rag like this OP’s link.
~~~~~~~~~~
It’s just killing you that a source Fauci does not approve of is allowed to publish information.
The great mRNA experiment is over. It cannot keep you from infection, it cannot keep you from transmitting, it cannot keep you out of the hospital, it cannot keep you from dying, has an unacceptable number of deaths and injuries and does not last very long. Lastly, it suppresses your natural immune system and we have NO idea of long term effects other than a lifetime of boosters.
>>Freerepublic doesn’t do that, and it easy to see and find out if you know where to look.
Every single link you click on on that clickbait website is sent directly to facebook and google - if you have a facebook account or google account, it is tied to you and your email address. If you don’t have an account at either place, they use a ‘fingerprint’ to track you - a combination of your ipaddress, browser, monitor resolution etc that they use to track you from one website to another.
If you visit either site, every thing you look at or click on is sent to facebook and google and becomes part of your ‘permanent record’.
Truly conservative websites should not be in bed with google or facebook. Freerepublic isn’t, and for that I am thankful.
Standard deflection tactic of a vax advocate - say that more information is needed, and when that's supplied, think of more that's needed. No combination of quantity and quality of data will ever be sufficient. People just have to keep dying from the 'vaccine' because it's impossible to gather useful information about their toxic, lethal effects.
to me that is real news that demands an answer and soon - but as long as those opposed to the vaccine use misleading websites like theexpose.uk to make bogus claims, we will never get an answer, because anyone that opposes the vaccine then becomes moron and easily dismissed.
Standard deflection tactic, pretend that censorship hasn't eliminated discussion from the public view, pretend that information that makes it past the censors is why there's censorship and/or information is dismissed.
>>It’s just killing you that a source Fauci does not approve of is allowed to publish information.
I get it, you either own, or get paid by the website to drive traffic to it, congrats.
>>Standard deflection tactic, pretend that censorship hasn’t eliminated discussion from the public view, pretend that information that makes it past the censors is why there’s censorship and/or information is dismissed.
I get it, your solution is to go full retard - how is that working out for you other than pimping clickbait websites?
>>Standard deflection tactic of a vax advocate - say that more information is needed, and when that’s supplied, think of more that’s needed. No combination of quantity and quality of data will ever be sufficient. People just have to keep dying from the ‘vaccine’ because it’s impossible to gather useful information about their toxic, lethal effects.
So you don’t want the autopsy reports, you have already analyzed the information and have all the answers - got it.
Keep right on pimping for clicks.
However, actual science says vaccines don’t work for viruses based on the common cold. Never have. Never will.
I’m waiting for him/her to “circle back” to that. Then we will be able to determine his “vested” interests in mandating experimental and untested clot shots into every mortal soul.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.