So here’s a question: when you call an mRNA tech a vaccine despite the fact that it neither stops people catching the disease or being contagious but only selectively affects a very few of all possible strains which have a specific “spike protein” (where actual dead virus vaccines allow the body to develop antibodies to most all such proteins in one go) what have you in fact created except a way to achieve gain of function research among the general population by filtering out some virus strains and allowing others to flourish?
Dr. McCullough talks about that: https://rumble.com/vnbv86-winning-the-war-against-therapeutic-nihilism-and-trusted-treatments-vs-unte.html
“(where actual dead virus vaccines allow the body to develop antibodies to most all such proteins in one go)”
Vaccine builders created whole virus vaccines for both SARS-1 and MERS, the two closest cousins of the Covid-19 virus.
The vaccines worked when it came to generating antibodies, but when the vaccinated test animals were challenged by exposure to the wild virus they died from vaccine antibody-dependent enhancement, VADE. Which is a reason why that technique wasn’t used for Covid.
As can be seen in the following study even the entire spike protein alone carries the risk of ADE so the vaccines don’t use the entire spike.
“Learning from the past: development of safe and effective COVID-19 vaccines”:
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41579-020-00462-y
“An ideal antigen should be selected for the development of a safe and effective COVID-19 vaccine. The S protein is the major antigen in most COVID-19 vaccine candidates under development as it contains the major neutralizing epitopes and is located on the surface of the viral particle. However, the full-length S protein of SARS-CoV also contains several immunodominant sites that can induce non-neutralizing antibodies, including those associated with ADE, or harmful immune responses”